Adaptive Cruise Control Dynamic Gain Scheduling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional cruise control systems fail to react quickly enough to changes in the lead vehicle's operation, leading to unsafe separation between vehicles, particularly at low speeds in traffic jams where frequent stops occur.

Innovation Solution

An adaptive cruise control system that calculates and controls the autonomous vehicle's desired velocity by considering both the relative distance and velocity to the lead vehicle, using a dynamic gain value to enable full stop functionality, mimicking human defensive driving behavior.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional cruise control systems maintain constant speed or constant following distance, then the controlled vehicle can operate autonomously, but the system fails to react quickly enough to changes in the lead vehicle's operation, causing unsafe separation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety of vehicle followingVSAvoidresponse speed to lead vehicle changes
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic gain scheduling that adjusts the controller gain based on the relative velocity between the lead vehicle and controlled vehicle. When the controlled vehicle is slower than the lead vehicle, a higher gain is applied to increase responsiveness and reduce following distance more aggressively. This dynamic adjustment allows the system to react more quickly to lead vehicle changes while maintaining stability during normal operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the control parameter (gain value) based on the operating condition (velocity differential). By switching between different gain values depending on whether the controlled vehicle is slower or faster than the lead vehicle, the system adapts its response characteristics to maintain safety across varying driving conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of operation

If the controlled vehicle maintains a constant following distance, then the system is simple to operate, but it cannot fully stop when the lead vehicle stops at low speeds, particularly in traffic jams

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautonomous following capabilityVSAvoidlow speed stopping capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic gain scheduling that adjusts the controller gain based on the relative velocity between the lead vehicle and controlled vehicle. When the controlled vehicle is slower than the lead vehicle, a higher gain is applied to increase responsiveness and reduce following distance more aggressively. This dynamic adjustment allows the system to react more quickly to lead vehicle changes while maintaining stability during normal operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the control parameter (gain value) based on the operating condition (velocity differential). By switching between different gain values depending on whether the controlled vehicle is slower or faster than the lead vehicle, the system adapts its response characteristics to maintain safety across varying driving conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS10737695B2System and method for adaptive cruise control for low speed following
Publication Date: 2020.08.11 CREATEAI INC
  • US10737695B2 patent drawing
  • US10737695B2 patent drawing
  • US10737695B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method for adaptive cruise control for low speed following are disclosed. A particular embodiment includes: receiving input object data from a subsystem of an autonomous vehicle, the input object data including distance data and velocity data relative to a lead vehicle; generating a weighted distance differential corresponding to a weighted difference between an actual distance between the autonomous vehicle and the lead vehicle and a desired distance between the autonomous vehicle and the lead vehicle; generating a weighted velocity differential corresponding to a weighted difference between a velocity of the autonomous vehicle and a velocity of the lead vehicle; combining the weighted distance differential and the weighted velocity differential with the velocity of the lead vehicle to produce a velocity command for the autonomous vehicle; adjusting the velocity command using a dynamic gain; and controlling the autonomous vehicle to conform to the adjusted velocity command.