Adaptive Cruise Control Gap Adjustment via Environmental Sensing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional adaptive cruise control systems require manual adjustments by drivers to adapt gap settings to changing environmental conditions, which can be uncomfortable and inefficient, especially in situations with varying traffic densities or road conditions.

Innovation Solution

A driver assistance system that uses sensors to detect environmental conditions and adjust the gap between vehicles automatically based on estimated indicators, such as traffic density, road conditions, and time of day, allowing for dynamic adaptation of gap settings to optimize safety and comfort.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If the driver manually adjusts the gap setting to adapt to different environmental conditions, then the gap can be customized for specific situations, but the driver comfort deteriorates due to frequent manual adjustments

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegap adaptation to environmental conditionsVSAvoiddriver comfort
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically detects environmental conditions (traffic density, road conditions, time of day) and adjusts the gap setting without requiring driver intervention. The driver assistance system serves itself by monitoring sensors and making autonomous gap adjustments, eliminating the need for frequent manual operations while maintaining adaptability to changing conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors environmental conditions through sensors and uses this feedback to dynamically adjust the gap setting. The feedback loop compares current environmental conditions with preset conditions and automatically modifies the gap accordingly, ensuring the system adapts to changing situations without driver input

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If the gap is increased to ensure safety in low traffic density, then safety is improved, but the road capacity utilization deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidroad capacity utilization
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The gap setting is made dynamic rather than static, automatically adjusting based on real-time environmental conditions. In low traffic density conditions, the system increases the gap for enhanced safety, while in high traffic density conditions, it reduces the gap to maximize road capacity utilization. This dynamic adaptation allows the system to optimize both safety and productivity according to current traffic conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the gap parameter automatically based on detected environmental conditions. When traffic density increases or road conditions improve, the gap parameter is reduced to allow closer following distances, thereby increasing road capacity utilization while maintaining appropriate safety margins through continuous parameter adjustment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If the gap is decreased to prevent frequent cut-ins in dense traffic, then road capacity utilization is improved, but the safety margin deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveroad capacity utilizationVSAvoidsafety margin
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the gap setting based on real-time environmental conditions. In dense traffic situations, the system safely reduces the gap to prevent frequent cut-ins and maximize road capacity utilization, while continuously monitoring conditions to ensure the reduced gap maintains adequate safety margins. This dynamic adjustment allows the system to optimize productivity without permanently compromising safety

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Measurement precision

If multiple sensor types are integrated to improve environmental condition detection, then measurement precision is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenvironmental condition detectionVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The driver assistance system integrates multiple sensor types (cameras, radar, LIDAR) that serve multiple functions. These sensors not only detect environmental conditions for gap adjustment but also provide data for object detection, collision avoidance, and other driver assistance functions. This multi-functionality approach improves measurement precision for environmental condition detection while minimizing the increase in device complexity by leveraging existing sensor infrastructure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS9969393B2Intelligent gap setting for adaptive cruise control
Publication Date: 2018.05.15 HONDA MOTOR CO LTD
  • US9969393B2 patent drawing
  • US9969393B2 patent drawing
  • US9969393B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention relates to a method for assisting a driver in driving a vehicle, in which sensor data are produced by at least one sensor physically sensing the environment of a host vehicle or by obtaining data conveying information about the environment of a host vehicle, an object in a path of the host vehicle is detected based on the sensor data, a distance between the host vehicle and the detected object is controlled based on a preset gap (tGAP), environmental conditions of the host vehicle are estimated based on the sensor data, gap adaption indicators associated to the estimated environmental conditions are determined, wherein each of the gap adaption indicators indicates an extension or a reduction of the preset gap (tGAP) and the preset gap (tGAP) is adjusted based on the gap adaption indicators.