Adaptive Driver Alert System for Collision Avoidance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing vehicle monitoring systems often fail to accurately detect events due to incomplete or incorrect data, leading to false and irrelevant warnings that can distract or startle drivers, compromising safety and comfort.

Innovation Solution

A method that determines a driver's presence and profile by comparing attributes with stored data, detects events associated with potential collisions, and generates adaptive warnings based on external environment data, ensuring relevant and accurate alerts to enhance driver safety.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If monitoring systems issue warnings at high volumes to alert drivers, then driver awareness of potential hazards is improved, but driver distraction and sudden harmful actions increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriver awarenessVSAvoiddriver distraction
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies different warning strategies to different drivers based on their individual characteristics. Driver profiles capture attributes such as age, experience level, and response patterns, allowing the system to customize warning intensity and type for each driver rather than using a uniform approach. This resolves the contradiction by making warnings locally optimized for each driver's needs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The warning system dynamically adjusts its behavior based on real-time conditions and driver state. The system monitors driver responses to previous warnings and modifies subsequent warning intensity accordingly. This dynamic adaptation allows the system to maintain high awareness without causing excessive distraction, as warnings are tuned to the specific driver's current state and historical response patterns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If monitoring systems issue frequent warnings to ensure safety, then hazard detection coverage is improved, but driver comfort and driving quality deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehazard detection coverageVSAvoiddriver comfort
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system customizes warning frequency and intensity based on individual driver profiles and specific hazard contexts. Rather than issuing uniform frequent warnings to all drivers, the system adjusts warning parameters locally for each driver-hazard combination, maintaining comprehensive hazard detection while preserving driver comfort through personalized alerting strategies.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes warning parameters such as intensity, frequency, and modality based on driver profile attributes and hazard severity. By dynamically adjusting these parameters, the system ensures adequate hazard detection coverage while optimizing driver comfort through tailored warning characteristics that match individual driver preferences and responses.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Device complexity

If monitoring systems use simple detection algorithms, then system complexity is reduced, but event detection accuracy deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem complexityVSAvoidevent detection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system introduces driver profiles as an intermediary layer between simple detection algorithms and accurate event detection. The profiles store pre-processed driver attributes and historical data that enhance the output of simple detection algorithms. This intermediary allows the system to maintain algorithmic simplicity while achieving improved detection accuracy through the mediating information provided by driver-specific profiles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-processing and storing driver attributes, behavioral patterns, and preferences in profiles before actual event detection occurs. This preliminary preparation enables simple detection algorithms to leverage pre-computed driver-specific information, achieving accurate event detection without increasing the complexity of the real-time detection algorithms themselves.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS10745030B2Providing location and driving behavior based alerts
Publication Date: 2020.08.18 NOVUS HI-TECH ROBOTIC SYSTEMZ PRIVATE LTD
  • US10745030B2 patent drawing
  • US10745030B2 patent drawing
  • US10745030B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present subject matter relates to providing alerts to the driver based on comparison between the driver's driving behaviour and the general driving behavior. Driver presence is determined after which the driver is identified using identification attributes extracted. Further, data related to external environment to a vehicle is fetched. Based on the fetched external environment data an event is determined. Also, the driving behavior of the driver is compared with the general driving behavior for the vehicle. Based on the determined event and the deviations of driver's driving behavior from the general driving behavior, suggestive alert is generated for the driver of the vehicle. The intensity of the warning is varied based on severity of the event.