Adaptive Driver Assistance Road Boundary Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional driver assistance systems do not provide personalized feedback based on individual driver preferences and road conditions, leading to discomfort when navigating close to road boundaries, especially in complex environments like narrow or busy roads.

Innovation Solution

A driver assistance system that uses sensors and a controller to determine the distance to road boundaries and apply feedback operations, such as haptic and visual warnings, to help drivers maintain a preferred distance, adjusting based on driver-specific parameters and real-time road features.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional driver assistance systems provide feedback based on lane dividing lines, then lane departure can be prevented, but driver comfort and safety are not optimized for individual preferences and road conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelane departure preventionVSAvoiddriver preference adaptation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the feedback threshold distance based on driver profile, road conditions, and vehicle speed. Unlike fixed threshold systems, this allows the safe distance parameter to change adaptively, resolving the contradiction between maintaining reliable lane departure prevention and adapting to individual driver preferences and varying road conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes multiple parameters including feedback threshold distance, feedback intensity, and activation conditions based on driver profile and road conditions. This allows the same basic system to provide personalized assistance while maintaining reliable lane departure prevention across different driving scenarios

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Device complexity

If the system provides feedback based on fixed distance thresholds, then implementation is simple, but driver comfort is compromised on narrow or busy roads

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem implementation complexityVSAvoiddriver comfort
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-defining multiple feedback threshold distances corresponding to different road conditions and driver profiles. These pre-configured thresholds are stored and automatically selected based on current conditions, avoiding the need for complex real-time calculations while still providing comfortable, personalized feedback

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The feedback threshold is made dynamic rather than fixed, allowing it to adjust based on driver profile, vehicle speed, and road conditions. This resolves the contradiction by enabling driver comfort optimization through adaptive thresholds while keeping the underlying system relatively simple through structured parameter selection

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Reliability

If the system applies strong feedback operations, then road boundary avoidance is effective, but driver comfort may be reduced due to excessive intervention

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveroad boundary avoidance effectivenessVSAvoiddriver comfort
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies partial action by providing feedback only when the vehicle approaches the personalized threshold distance, rather than continuously. The feedback intensity and type (visual, auditory, haptic) are also adjusted based on proximity, providing sufficient intervention for safety while avoiding excessive feedback that would discomfort the driver

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements multi-level feedback mechanisms including visual warnings, auditory alerts, and haptic steering wheel feedback. The feedback type and intensity are adaptively selected based on how close the vehicle is to the boundary and the driver profile, ensuring effective boundary avoidance while maintaining driver comfort through appropriate feedback escalation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS10272946B2Method and system of assisting a driver of a vehicle
Publication Date: 2019.04.30 NISSAN MOTOR CO LTD
  • US10272946B2 patent drawing
  • US10272946B2 patent drawing
  • US10272946B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of assisting a driver of a vehicle, the method includes obtaining a location of a road boundary relative to the vehicle using a sensor, selecting, via a controller, a parameter to assist a driver of the vehicle when approaching the location of the road boundary based on a condition, determining, via the controller, based on the location of the road boundary whether the vehicle will be a predetermined distance from the road boundary, and providing a feedback operation to assist the driver in avoiding the road boundary based on the selected parameter.