Adaptive Driver Assistance Feedback for Road Boundary Avoidance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional driver assistance systems do not provide personalized feedback based on individual driver preferences and road features, leading to discomfort when navigating varying road conditions such as narrow roads or busy multilane roads.

Innovation Solution

A driver assistance system that uses sensors and a controller to determine the distance to road boundaries and apply feedback operations, such as haptic feedback and steering adjustments, tailored to each driver's comfort level and specific road conditions, by selecting parameters based on features like road curvature and vehicle position.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional driver assistance systems provide feedback based on standard lane departure detection, then lane departure prevention is achieved, but driver comfort is compromised when navigating narrow roads or busy multilane roads

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelane departure preventionVSAvoiddriver comfort
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the feedback parameter based on real-time road width detection and driver behavior patterns. The controller modifies the feedback intensity and timing according to the detected road conditions and driver responses, making the assistance adaptive rather than static. This resolves the contradiction by allowing the system to maintain reliable lane departure prevention while adapting to varying driver comfort needs across different road scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the feedback parameter (such as feedback intensity, timing, or type) based on detected road features like road width and curvature. By adjusting this parameter dynamically, the system provides appropriate feedback intensity for narrow roads versus multilane roads, resolving the contradiction between maintaining reliable lane departure prevention and ensuring driver comfort across diverse operating conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Device complexity

If the system provides standardized feedback to all drivers, then system simplicity is maintained, but individual driver preferences and comfort levels are not accommodated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem simplicityVSAvoidpersonalization capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically detects driver behavior patterns and road features, then self-adjusts the feedback parameter without requiring manual driver input or complex configuration interfaces. This self-service approach maintains system simplicity while enabling personalization, as the system learns and adapts to individual driver preferences autonomously based on observed behavior and road conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary detection of road features and driver behavior patterns before providing feedback, allowing it to pre-adjust the feedback parameter to match upcoming conditions and driver preferences. This preliminary action enables the system to maintain simplicity while being highly adaptable, as the parameter is adjusted in advance based on detected patterns rather than requiring complex real-time processing or user configuration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Ease of operation

If the feedback parameter is adjusted based on multiple road features and driver behavior, then driver comfort and safety are improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriver comfortVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The controller is designed to perform multiple functions: detecting road features, analyzing driver behavior patterns, determining feedback timing, and adjusting feedback intensity. By consolidating these multiple functions into a single multi-functional controller, the system improves driver comfort through comprehensive parameter adjustment while minimizing the increase in overall system complexity through functional integration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS9994254B2Method and system of assisting a driver of a vehicle
Publication Date: 2018.06.12 NISSAN MOTOR CO LTD
  • US9994254B2 patent drawing
  • US9994254B2 patent drawing
  • US9994254B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of assisting a driver of a vehicle in driving a road, the method includes obtaining a feature of a road using a sensor, selecting, via a controller, a parameter based on the feature of the road, determining, via a controller, whether the vehicle is approaching a boundary of the road, and providing a feedback operation to assist the driver in avoiding the boundary of the road, the feedback operation based on the selected parameter.