Adaptive Filter for Lithography Metrology Noise Suppression

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current metrology systems in lithographic apparatuses face challenges in suppressing measurement noise, particularly due to instabilities in alignment sensors and illumination optics, which can lead to tracking errors and compromised overlay performance.

Innovation Solution

A metrology system that includes a radiation source, reflector, interferometer, and controller, which calculates multiple correction values based on different coefficients and applies them based on threshold differences to effectively manage noise, using an adaptive filter approach to improve measurement accuracy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If a filter is used to suppress measurement noise, then measurement noise is reduced, but phase lag is introduced resulting in tracking error

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemeasurement noise suppressionVSAvoidtracking accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a multi-stage adaptive filtering system where filter coefficients are dynamically adjusted based on real-time measurement conditions. The system transitions between different filter stages (first, second, and third stages) with increasing aggressiveness, selecting the appropriate stage based on the detected noise level and rate of change. This dynamic adaptation allows the system to maintain low tracking error during stable conditions while effectively suppressing noise during turbulent conditions, resolving the contradiction between noise suppression and tracking accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes filter parameters (coefficients and stages) based on the measured noise characteristics. By monitoring the rate of change and magnitude of measurements, the system adjusts the filter aggressiveness parameter, switching between conservative (first stage), moderate (second stage), and aggressive (third stage) filtering. This parameter adaptation enables the system to optimize the trade-off between noise suppression and phase lag compensation under different operating conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If a conservative filter is used, then tracking error is reduced, but measurement noise suppression is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetracking accuracyVSAvoidnoise suppression effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically switches between conservative and aggressive filtering modes based on real-time conditions. During periods of low noise and stable measurements, the system uses the first stage filter with conservative coefficients to minimize phase lag and maintain tracking accuracy. When noise levels increase or measurement variability exceeds thresholds, the system transitions to second and third stages with more aggressive coefficients, thereby achieving effective noise suppression without permanently sacrificing tracking accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The filtering approach applies periodic reassessment of noise conditions and adaptive adjustment of filter stages. The system continuously monitors measurement characteristics and periodically transitions between filter stages, applying the appropriate level of filtering aggressiveness. This periodic adaptation ensures that the system maintains optimal performance by switching from conservative to aggressive filtering as conditions warrant, and vice versa.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

3Adaptability or versatility

If multiple correction values with different coefficients are calculated, then adaptability to changing noise conditions is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenoise condition adaptabilityVSAvoidfiltering system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The filtering system is segmented into three distinct stages, each with specific coefficient ranges and application conditions. The first stage uses conservative coefficients for normal conditions, the second stage uses moderate coefficients for intermediate conditions, and the third stage uses aggressive coefficients for high-noise conditions. This segmentation allows the system to achieve high adaptability by selecting the appropriate stage, while keeping each individual stage relatively simple and well-defined.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different filter coefficients and stages are applied locally based on the specific noise conditions detected. Rather than using a single complex adaptive algorithm, the system applies simple, well-defined coefficient sets locally appropriate to each operating condition. The controller selects which local filter configuration to apply based on real-time measurements, achieving high adaptability through conditional selection rather than through complex continuous adaptation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The adaptive filter method effectively reduces measurement noise, enhancing the accuracy and stability of the metrology system by dynamically adjusting to changing noise conditions, thereby improving overlay performance.

Implementation Method 1

The interferometer interferes the light that has been diffracted from a pattern on the substrate, or reflected from the substrate, and produces output light from the interference

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectInterference: Interference

Data Source

PatentUS10928738B2Adaptive filter for in-line correction
Publication Date: 2021.02.23 ASML HLDG NV
  • US10928738B2 patent drawing
  • US10928738B2 patent drawing
  • US10928738B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of applying a measurement correction includes calculating a first correction value based on a first coefficient and the measurement; calculating a second correction value based on a second coefficient, greater than the first coefficient, and the measurement; and calculating a third correction value based on a third coefficient, greater than the second coefficient, and the measurement. The method also includes applying the third correction value to the measurement if a difference between the first correction value and the third correction value is above a first threshold value; applying the second correction value to the measurement if a difference between the first correction value and the second correction value is above a second threshold value; and applying the first correction value to the measurement if the difference between the first correction value and the second correction value is below or equal to the second threshold value.