Adaptive Robotic Grinding Control for Consistent Material Removal

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Robotic grinding systems face challenges in maintaining consistent material removal rates due to their inability to dynamically adjust operational parameters based on real-time conditions, such as abrasive wear and workpiece interactions, leading to inconsistent cutting rates over time.

Innovation Solution

A grinding setting selection system that includes an abrasive rotational speed retriever, end effector load retriever, and material removal predictor, which adjusts mechanical settings like rotational speed, press force, and grind angle based on predicted removal rates to maintain consistent material removal rates.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If robotic grinding systems operate with fixed mechanical settings, then device complexity is reduced and ease of operation is improved, but material removal rate consistency deteriorates and productivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial removal rate consistencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts mechanical settings (rotational speed, feed rate, depth of cut) during the grinding process based on real-time monitoring of material removal rate, transforming the static robotic grinding system into an adaptive one that maintains consistent performance throughout the operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements a closed-loop feedback mechanism where material removal rate is continuously measured and used to adjust grinding parameters, enabling the system to self-correct and maintain consistent material removal rates despite variations in workpiece properties or tool wear

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Ease of operation

If robotic grinding systems use automated fixed settings, then labor intensity is reduced and ease of operation is improved, but material removal rate consistency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomation levelVSAvoidmaterial removal rate consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The robotic grinding system performs self-adjustment of its own parameters by automatically monitoring material removal rate and modifying its own operational settings, eliminating the need for human intervention while maintaining consistent performance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from static automated operation to dynamic automated operation, where the robotic system continuously adapts its parameters based on real-time conditions, maintaining both automation benefits and performance consistency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Productivity

If robotic grinding systems operate without dynamic parameter adjustment, then device complexity is reduced, but material removal rate consistency deteriorates and productivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial removal rate consistencyVSAvoidparameter adjustment system
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses real-time feedback from material removal rate measurement to automatically adjust grinding parameters, creating a closed-loop control system that maintains consistent productivity without requiring complex manual intervention

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically changes operational parameters (rotational speed, feed rate, depth of cut) based on measured material removal rate, allowing the system to optimize productivity while managing complexity through automated parameter adjustment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20230264315A1Robotic repair control systems and methods
Publication Date: 2023.08.24 3M INNOVATIVE PROPERTIES CO
  • US20230264315A1 patent drawing
  • US20230264315A1 patent drawing
  • US20230264315A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A grinding setting selection system for a robotic grinding system is presented. The system includes an abrasive rotational speed retriever that retrieves a current rotational speed of a grinder in the robotic grinding system. The system also includes an end effector load retriever that receives a current end effector load of an end effector in the robotic grinding system. The system also includes a material removal predictor that, based on the retrieved rotational speed and the end effector road, predicts a material removal rate. The system also includes a setting adjuster that, based on the predicted removal rate, provides a setting adjustment for the robotic grinding system. The setting adjustment alters a mechanical setting of the robotic grinding system. The system also includes a setting communicator that communicates the setting adjustment to the robotic grinding system.