Adaptive Hill-Hold Control for Vehicle Stability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current hill-hold control systems uniformly apply braking pressure to all wheels, leading to over-braking and increased durability and noise-vibration-heat issues due to excessive pressure, and fail to optimize pressure levels for different wheels within a hydraulic unit.

Innovation Solution

An adaptive hill-hold control system that dynamically adjusts braking pressure at each wheel based on vehicle parameters, such as weight and road gradient, to minimize excess pressure and optimize pressure distribution across wheels, allowing for different pressure levels at various brakes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If uniform braking pressure is applied to all wheels, then the vehicle is held in place, but excessive pressure is applied leading to increased durability requirements and noise-vibration-heat issues

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevehicle stabilityVSAvoidnoise-vibration-heat issues
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies different braking pressures to different wheels based on their individual requirements. The controller adjusts pressure levels locally at each wheel rather than applying uniform pressure, allowing optimal pressure distribution that maintains stability while reducing excessive pressure and associated NVH issues.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The braking pressure is dynamically adjusted based on real-time vehicle conditions, driver input, and wheel-specific parameters. The system transitions from static uniform pressure to dynamic adaptive pressure control, optimizing the balance between holding the vehicle and minimizing harmful effects.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Device complexity

If uniform braking pressure is applied to all wheels, then the control strategy is simple, but it does not optimize pressure levels for different wheels within a hydraulic unit

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol strategy complexityVSAvoidpressure optimization capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The control system implements local quality by allowing each wheel to receive customized pressure levels based on its specific requirements, vehicle position, and hydraulic circuit characteristics, rather than applying a single uniform pressure to all wheels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The braking system is segmented into independent controllable units at the wheel level, with the ability to apply different pressures to different wheels. This segmentation enables optimized pressure distribution across the vehicle while maintaining manageable control through the electronic control unit.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Reliability

If more braking pressure is applied, then the vehicle is held more securely in place, but more current is required to control the switchover valve coil

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehill-hold capabilityVSAvoidcurrent consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes the pressure parameter dynamically based on actual vehicle conditions rather than maintaining constant high pressure. By adjusting pressure levels to match the minimum required for hill-hold, the system reduces the current demand on the switchover valve coil while maintaining adequate holding capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Reduces noise-vibration-heat issues and increases durability by applying only the necessary pressure to hold the vehicle in place, enhancing the overall efficiency and longevity of the brake system while maintaining vehicle stability.

Implementation Method 1

a first wheel brake, a second wheel brake

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Data Source

PatentEP2991865B1Adaptive hill-hold control
Publication Date: 2021.06.09 ROBERT BOSCH GMBH
  • EP2991865B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2991865B1 patent drawingFigure 2A~2B
  • EP2991865B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A hill-hold control system for a vehicle. The hill-hold control system includes a first wheel brake (120A, 120B), a second wheel brake (120C, 120D), a braking indicator (brake pedal), a drive away indicator (accelerator), and a controller (130). The controller is configured to determine that the vehicle is at standstill, detect from the braking indicator that braking is no longer desired, adjust a braking pressure at the first wheel brake, adjust a braking pressure at the second wheel brake, detect from the drive away indicator an operator's desire to drive away, and when the operator's desire to drive away is detected, removing the braking pressure at the first wheel brake and the braking pressure at the second wheel brake.