Adaptive Rail Brake Pressure Control via Load and Speed Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current brake systems in rail vehicles face challenges in meeting high safety requirements, particularly during rapid braking operations, as they struggle to adapt to varying loads and speeds, leading to potential safety integrity level (SIL) compliance issues and inconsistent braking performance.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a method and brake system that utilizes a pneumatic brake actuator and an electropneumatic brake device, where a basic brake pressure is established and adjusted based on load and speed, allowing for adaptive control and compensation of system fluctuations, ensuring consistent braking performance and safety during rapid braking.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a conventional brake system is used without adaptive control, then the device complexity is reduced, but the braking performance becomes inconsistent under varying loads and speeds

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebraking performance consistencyVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The brake system implements dynamic control by continuously adjusting brake pressure based on real-time detection of load and speed parameters. The control device modifies braking characteristics adaptively to maintain consistent performance across varying operating conditions, transforming a static brake system into a dynamic one that responds to changing parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs feedback mechanisms where sensors detect actual load and speed values, the control device processes this information, and adjusts brake pressure accordingly. This closed-loop feedback ensures that braking performance remains consistent by comparing actual conditions with target braking characteristics and making real-time corrections.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If adaptive control based on load and speed is implemented, then safety integrity level compliance is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety integrity level complianceVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system is segmented into distinct functional modules: detection units for load and speed, a control device for processing, and execution mechanisms for brake pressure adjustment. This modular segmentation allows the complex adaptive control function to be implemented through coordinated simple modules, making the system manageable while achieving high safety integrity levels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The brake system performs self-adjustment by automatically detecting its own operating parameters (load and speed) and autonomously modifying brake pressure without external intervention. This self-service capability enables the system to maintain safety compliance adaptively, reducing the need for complex external control while improving reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Reliability

If brake pressure is adjusted based on varying loads and speeds, then braking performance consistency is improved, but the control complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebraking performance consistencyVSAvoidcontrol operation simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The brake system automatically detects load and speed conditions and adjusts brake pressure without requiring manual intervention or complex operator inputs. The system serves itself by using its own operational parameters to control its braking force, simplifying operation while maintaining consistent performance across varying conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces manual mechanical brake adjustment with automated electronic or pneumatic control based on detected parameters. Sensors and control devices substitute for manual operation, automatically translating load and speed information into appropriate brake pressure adjustments, thereby maintaining performance consistency while simplifying operator tasks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS11351972B2Method for controlling or regulating a brake system and brake system
Publication Date: 2022.06.07 KNORR BREMSE SYST FUR SCHIENENFAHRZEUGE GMBH
  • US11351972B2 patent drawing
  • US11351972B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention relates to a brake system of a rail vehicle having at least one pneumatic brake actuator, a pneumatic braking device for generating a brake pressure, an electro-pneumatic braking device for generating a brake pressure, and a controller. In the event of rapid, forcible, or emergency braking, the pneumatic braking device or the electro-pneumatic braking device provides a basic brake pressure, and the brake pressure is changed by the electro-pneumatic braking device, starting from the basic brake pressure provided, depending in particular on a load and/or a speed.