Adjustable Cable Anchoring for Reliable Load Transfer

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing cable anchoring systems fail to effectively transfer external loading from telecommunications cables to enclosures, potentially damaging internal components due to inadequate anchoring mechanisms.

Innovation Solution

The development of adjustable cable anchoring systems with resiliently deformable features and snap-fit or inelastically deformed stop features that enhance friction and limit sliding motion, allowing secure attachment of cables of varying sizes to structures.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional cable anchoring mechanisms are used, then the structure is simple, but the loading is not effectively transferred from cables to enclosures, potentially damaging internal components

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveloading transfer effectivenessVSAvoidanchoring system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The anchoring system is divided into separate functional components: a cable clamp for securing the cable, a load transfer mechanism with friction surfaces, and an enclosure mounting interface. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized for its specific function while collectively achieving reliable load transfer without excessive overall complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary anchoring mechanism between the cable and enclosure that actively manages load transfer. This intermediary component includes friction surfaces and adjustable elements that mediate the force transmission, ensuring loads are properly transferred to the enclosure structure rather than directly to internal components

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Adaptability or versatility

If fixed-size anchoring attachments are used, then the manufacturing is simple, but the system cannot accommodate cables of different sizes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecable size accommodationVSAvoidattachment adjustability mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The anchoring attachment incorporates dynamic, adjustable elements that can be modified to accommodate different cable sizes. The attachment includes movable components and adjustable fastening mechanisms that adapt to various cable diameters, transitioning from a static fixed-size design to a dynamic adaptable system

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system allows adjustment of key parameters such as clamp diameter, fastening position, and friction surface contact area to match different cable sizes. By making these parameters variable rather than fixed, the attachment can be optimized for each specific cable while maintaining a relatively simple overall structure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If resiliently deformable features are added to enhance friction, then the retention is improved, but the manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveattachment retentionVSAvoidmanufacturing process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs flexible, resilient elements such as deformable lips or friction surfaces that can elastically deform to engage with the cable and surrounding structure. These flexible features enhance friction and retention through their ability to conform and press against contact surfaces, while being manufacturable as integrated elastomeric or metal components

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

4Manufacturing precision

If stop features are incorporated to limit sliding motion, then the positioning precision is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveattachment positioning accuracyVSAvoidstop feature structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The stop features are pre-configured into the anchoring attachment structure during manufacturing, positioned to automatically engage at predetermined locations. This preliminary positioning ensures accurate attachment placement without requiring complex adjustment mechanisms or post-installation calibration, as the stops are already in place to guide and limit sliding motion

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system ensures secure anchoring of cables, minimizing play and enhancing friction, thereby transferring external loading to the enclosure rather than internal components, protecting sensitive equipment.

Implementation Method 1

the attachments include resiliently deformable features that minimize play and provide enhanced friction for retaining the attachments in adjusted positions

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

the stop features can include snap-fit features that elastically move to a retention position

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElastic deformation: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentUS12540690B2Cable anchoring system
Publication Date: 2026.02.03 COMMSCOPE TECHNOLOGIES LLC
  • US12540690B2 patent drawing
  • US12540690B2 patent drawing
  • US12540690B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure relates to a cable anchoring system for securing a cable to another structure such as a bracket of an enclosure. The cable anchoring system includes a cable anchoring body and an anchoring attachment slidably mounted within a slot of the cable anchoring body.