Adjustable Container Gripper for Multi-Diameter Beverage Handling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing devices for handling large-volume beverage containers are not universally applicable to containers of different sizes and require manual handling, which is physically strenuous.

Innovation Solution

A gripping device with interchangeable format parts and adjustable stops that can accommodate containers of varying diameters, allowing for flexible adaptation to different container types and sizes, and includes a detection mechanism to prevent collision with containers.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a fixed gripping device is used, then the structure is simple, but it cannot handle containers of different sizes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to handle containers of different sizesVSAvoidgripping device structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The gripping device is divided into modular components: interchangeable format parts that can be attached to the gripper jaw and adjustable stops that can be repositioned along the gripper jaw. This segmentation allows the device to be reconfigured for different container sizes without replacing the entire gripping device, thus improving adaptability while controlling complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The gripping device incorporates dynamic elements including pneumatically movable gripper jaws and adjustable stops that can be repositioned along the gripper jaw. This dynamic capability enables the device to adapt to containers of varying diameters by adjusting the position of stops and exchanging format parts, resolving the contradiction between simplicity and versatility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Extent of automation

If manual handling is used, then the device complexity is low, but physical strain is high

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomated container handlingVSAvoidmanipulator structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical handling with an automated manipulator system that uses pneumatic actuators to control the gripper jaws and stops. This substitution eliminates physical strain on operators while the modular design of the manipulator keeps the overall system complexity manageable through standardized components and interchangeable format parts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Adaptability or versatility

If interchangeable format parts are used, then adaptability improves, but the number of components increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontainer size adaptationVSAvoidnumber of gripper components
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The base gripper jaw is designed as a universal component that can accommodate multiple interchangeable format parts. Each format part is designed to fit the same interface on the gripper jaw, allowing a single base component to serve multiple functions by simply changing the attached format part. This universality improves adaptability while minimizing the increase in total components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The gripping device is segmented into a base gripper jaw and interchangeable format parts, where the format parts are the only variable components needed for different container sizes. This segmentation strategy isolates the complexity to a manageable set of interchangeable parts rather than requiring a completely different gripping device for each container type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Adaptability or versatility

If stops are made adjustable, then versatility improves, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontainer diameter adaptationVSAvoidstop adjustment mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The stops are designed to be dynamically adjustable along the gripper jaw, allowing operators to reposition them according to container diameter. This dynamic adjustability is achieved through a simple mechanism that allows the stops to slide or be repositioned on the gripper jaw, providing versatility without requiring a complex reconfiguration system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The stops are pre-configured at specific positions along the gripper jaw, allowing operators to quickly select and attach the appropriate stop position before handling different container sizes. This preliminary configuration approach enables rapid adaptation to different container diameters without requiring complex real-time adjustment mechanisms during operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentEP4684928A1Device for treating containers, in particular large-volume beverage containers
Publication Date: 2026.01.28 KHS GMBH
  • EP4684928A1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP4684928A1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP4684928A1 patent drawingFigure 5~6

AI summary

The invention relates to a device for handling containers (10), in particular large-volume beverage containers, with a gripping device (100) having at least one gripper jaw (110), in particular pneumatically, movable in a gripping direction and at least one stop (120) extending downwards from an upper part (130) of the gripping device (100) in the axial direction of the respective containers (10) perpendicular to the gripping direction, wherein the device for handling containers (10) is designed with different diameters, wherein the at least one gripper jaw (110) has a container-dependent interchangeable format part (111) for contacting the containers (10) and wherein the stop (120) can be fixed at different positions on the upper part (130) of the gripping device (100) that are spaced apart from each other in the gripping direction, depending on the container.