Adjustable Density Sanding Sponge via Removable Core

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional sanding systems lack fine control over the density of the sanding sponge, requiring users to employ multiple sponges and techniques, which is costly and time-consuming.

Innovation Solution

A sanding system comprising a body with a hole extending lengthwise, where a core can be partially or fully inserted to change the density gradient, allowing for adjustable rigidity and grit distribution by removing, inserting, or adjusting the core's position within the body.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If conventional sanding systems use fixed density sponges, then the structure is simple, but the adaptability is poor requiring multiple sponges for different tasks

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedensity adjustabilityVSAvoidsystem structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The sanding sponge is divided into two main segments: a body portion and a removable core portion. The core can be extracted from the body through a cavity, allowing the user to switch between different core configurations (different densities, materials, or shapes) to adapt to various sanding tasks. This segmentation enables one sanding system to perform multiple functions that would otherwise require multiple separate sponges.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The sanding system transitions from a static fixed-density sponge to a dynamic configurable system. The removable core allows the density and properties of the sanding surface to be changed during use, enabling adaptation to different sanding stages (coarse to fine) and different material types without requiring multiple separate tools.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple fixed-density sponges are used for different sanding tasks, then the adaptability is good, but the device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesanding task coverageVSAvoidnumber of sponges
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

A single sanding sponge body is designed to accommodate multiple different cores with varying densities, materials, and configurations. This universal body design allows one base unit to perform the functions of multiple specialized sponges, reducing the total number of tools needed while maintaining versatility across different sanding applications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The core portion of the sanding sponge can be removed and replaced as needed. Used or worn cores can be discarded while the main body is retained and reused with different cores, providing a cost-effective solution where only the consumable core elements need replacement rather than the entire sanding sponge.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

3Quantity of substance

If the core is fully inserted in the hole, then the density is high for coarse sanding, but the flexibility is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecore insertion extentVSAvoidsanding flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The core insertion depth is made adjustable rather than fixed. Users can insert the core partially or fully into the body cavity depending on the sanding task requirements. This dynamic positioning allows optimization between density (full insertion for coarse sanding) and flexibility (partial insertion for fine sanding or contoured surfaces), giving users control over the sanding characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

By varying the insertion extent of the core into the body, the effective density and rigidity of the sanding surface can be changed. Full insertion provides maximum density for aggressive material removal, while partial insertion reduces density for finer work or more flexible applications, allowing parameter optimization for different sanding conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS12162118B2Flexible density sanding system
Publication Date: 2024.12.10 CREELEY PATENT LLC
  • US12162118B2 patent drawing
  • US12162118B2 patent drawing
  • US12162118B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments of sanding systems and methods for using and making the same may include providing a sanding system, comprising a body and a core. The body may be defined by at least a plurality of faces including a proximal face and a distal face and further defined by a hole extending lengthwise from the proximal face at least partially through the body toward the distal face. The core may be configured to be disposed at least partially within the hole such that changing an extent to which the core is disposed within the hole changes a density gradient of the sanding system.