AEB Estimated Acceleration Using Target Stop Likelihood

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional automatic emergency braking (AEB) systems rely on simple kinetic equations that fail to account for varying scenarios, leading to inaccurate estimated accelerations and resulting in either delayed or premature braking inputs, which can cause collisions or discomfort.

Innovation Solution

The system determines whether a target is likely to be stopped before a potential collision and selects an appropriate estimated-acceleration function to calculate the necessary acceleration for the host vehicle to avoid the collision, using equations based on the target's velocity, acceleration, and relative distance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional simple kinetic equations are used to determine estimated acceleration, then the calculation is simple and fast, but the accuracy is insufficient and cannot account for varying contexts such as target acceleration

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of estimated accelerationVSAvoidcomplexity of acceleration determination
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the acceleration determination process into multiple contexts based on target behavior (accelerating, decelerating, stationary). Different kinetic equations are selected based on the detected context, allowing each segment to use the most appropriate calculation method for that specific situation, thereby improving overall accuracy without requiring a single overly complex equation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically selects among multiple kinetic equations based on real-time detection of target acceleration state. The selection between different acceleration determination functions is not static but adapts to changing conditions, allowing the system to optimize accuracy for each specific scenario while maintaining computational efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If estimated acceleration is miscalculated, then the AEB system may apply braking inputs that are delayed or insufficient, but this can cause the vehicle to fail to avoid collisions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollision avoidance effectivenessVSAvoidaccuracy of estimated acceleration
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates feedback by continuously monitoring target acceleration state and using this information to select the appropriate kinetic equation. This feedback loop ensures that the acceleration calculation adapts to actual target behavior, improving reliability of collision avoidance by selecting the most accurate calculation method for each situation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameters of the kinetic equations based on target acceleration state. When the target is detected to be accelerating or decelerating, different parameters (such as target acceleration values) are incorporated into the calculation, allowing the system to maintain high measurement precision and reliability across varying conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of operation

If estimated acceleration is miscalculated, then the AEB system may apply braking inputs prematurely or unnecessarily, which may be uncomfortable for occupants and impact safety of other vehicles

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomfort of braking applicationVSAvoidaccuracy of estimated acceleration
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

By segmenting the calculation into different contexts (accelerating target, decelerating target, stationary target), the system avoids applying premature or unnecessary braking. Each segment uses equations appropriate to that context, preventing false collision avoidance scenarios that would cause uncomfortable braking events

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the single mechanical kinetic equation approach with a multi-equation selection system that substitutes the inappropriate equation with the appropriate one based on target behavior. This substitution prevents calculation errors that would lead to premature braking, improving ease of operation and occupant comfort

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS11772619B2Estimated-acceleration determination for automatic emergency braking
Publication Date: 2023.10.03 APTIV TECHNOLOGIES AG
  • US11772619B2 patent drawing
  • US11772619B2 patent drawing
  • US11772619B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The techniques and systems herein enable estimated-acceleration determination for AEB. Specifically, for a potential collision, a determination is made as to whether the target of the potential collision is likely to be stopped prior to the potential collision (e.g., due to its own braking). One of a plurality of estimated-acceleration functions is then selected based on whether the target is likely to be stopped prior to the potential collision. Using the selected estimated-acceleration function, an estimated acceleration to avoid the potential collision is calculated. By selecting different estimated-acceleration functions based on whether targets are likely to be stopped prior to potential collisions, more-accurate estimated accelerations may be generated, thus enabling better collision avoidance and/or avoiding unnecessarily strong braking.