Atomic Force Microscope Dynamic Interaction Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional atomic force microscopes (AFMs) used for soft matter observation, such as gels, face challenges in minimizing sample deformation due to mechanical interactions between the probe and the sample, leading to issues like probe sticking and distorted image data, especially during raster scanning.

Innovation Solution

The AFM employs a raster-scanning controller and interaction controller to adjust the relative speed between the cantilever and the sample, synchronizing the scanning to decrease interaction strength when the relative speed is low and increase it when it's high, thereby minimizing sample deformation and preventing probe sticking.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If the mechanical probe maintains constant interaction with the sample during raster scanning, then the sample surface information can be continuously acquired, but the sample deformation increases due to prolonged mechanical interaction at low relative speed regions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesample surface information acquisitionVSAvoidsample deformation
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by making the interaction strength variable rather than constant. The interaction controller dynamically adjusts the interaction strength between the mechanical probe and sample based on real-time relative speed feedback. When relative speed is low, interaction strength is reduced to minimize deformation; when relative speed is high, interaction strength is increased to maintain measurement continuity. This dynamic adjustment resolves the contradiction between continuous measurement and deformation prevention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback control through a closed-loop system where the relative speed between probe and sample is continuously monitored and fed back to the interaction controller. This feedback mechanism enables real-time adjustment of interaction strength, allowing the system to respond to changing relative speed conditions and maintain optimal balance between measurement quality and sample integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Measurement precision

If the relative speed between cantilever and sample is reduced in regions where speed decreases, then measurement continuity is maintained, but probe sticking occurs due to prolonged interaction

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemeasurement continuityVSAvoidprobe sticking
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts interaction strength based on relative speed conditions. Instead of maintaining constant interaction or uniformly reducing speed, the interaction controller modulates interaction strength in real-time according to local speed variations. This dynamic control prevents probe sticking by reducing interaction during low-speed regions while maintaining measurement continuity through adaptive adjustment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the interaction strength parameter dynamically based on relative speed conditions. By modulating this critical parameter in response to speed variations, the system prevents probe sticking while maintaining measurement continuity. The interaction strength is adjusted as a function of relative speed, transforming a static interaction model into a dynamic one that adapts to scanning conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If the interaction strength is increased to maintain measurement signal, then sample deformation increases, but if interaction strength is decreased, then measurement signal quality deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemeasurement signal qualityVSAvoidsample deformation
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent resolves this contradiction by making interaction strength dynamic rather than static. The interaction controller continuously adjusts interaction strength based on real-time relative speed measurements. During high-speed scanning regions, stronger interaction maintains signal quality; during low-speed regions, reduced interaction minimizes deformation. This dynamic balancing act allows the system to maintain measurement precision while reducing harmful effects.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the interaction strength parameter as a function of relative speed. By establishing a relationship between speed and interaction strength, the patent optimizes measurement signal quality when speed is high while minimizing sample deformation when speed is low. This parameter modulation strategy enables simultaneous achievement of both measurement quality and sample preservation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS10107833B2Atomic force microscope and control method of the same
Publication Date: 2018.10.23 OHBA YUSUKE
  • US10107833B2 patent drawing
  • US10107833B2 patent drawing
  • US10107833B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An atomic force microscope is to acquire sample information by a raster scanning of a cantilever with respect to a sample. The atomic force microscope includes a raster-scanning-information generator to generate raster scanning information including timing information. The timing information includes a first timing at which a relative speed between the cantilever and sample decreases lower than a threshold, and a second timing at which the relative speed increases higher than the threshold after the first timing. The atomic force microscope also includes a raster-scanning controller to control the raster scanning, and an interaction controller to decrease the strength of an interaction between the cantilever and sample at the first timing, and increase the strength of the interaction at the second timing.