Aircraft Fuel Management System Using Real-Time Component Data

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for managing aircraft fuel are inefficient, leading to excessive fuel carrying, reduced fuel efficiency, and increased operational costs due to inaccurate fuel calculations based on aircraft models.

Innovation Solution

A computer-based fuel management system that identifies actual fuel efficiency in real-time by comparing data from aircraft components with a model, allowing for precise fuel planning and reduction of unnecessary fuel load, thereby optimizing fuel use and reducing weight.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If more fuel than needed is transferred to the aircraft to ensure safety margins, then the reliability of mission completion is improved, but the weight of the aircraft increases and fuel efficiency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemission completion reliabilityVSAvoidaircraft weight
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically changes fuel planning parameters by transitioning from static model-based estimates to real-time actual fuel consumption data. This allows adjustment of fuel load parameters based on measured performance, achieving optimal reliability without excessive weight.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback by continuously monitoring actual fuel consumption during flight and using this information to adjust future fuel planning. This closed-loop approach ensures reliable mission completion while minimizing unnecessary fuel weight through learned performance patterns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If more fuel than needed is transferred to the aircraft to account for uncertainties, then the reliability of mission completion is improved, but the fuel efficiency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemission completion reliabilityVSAvoidfuel efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes the fuel planning parameter from conservative model-based estimates to data-driven actual consumption rates. This parameter transformation maintains mission reliability while improving fuel efficiency by eliminating over-provisioning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

Real-time fuel consumption monitoring provides feedback that enables continuous optimization of fuel efficiency. The system learns from actual performance data to determine precise fuel requirements, maintaining reliability without the penalty of reduced fuel efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If conservative fuel planning with large safety factors is used, then the reliability of mission completion is improved, but the operational cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemission completion reliabilityVSAvoidoperational cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses feedback from actual fuel consumption data to eliminate the need for excessive safety factors. This data-driven approach maintains mission reliability while reducing operational costs by optimizing fuel load to actual needs rather than conservative estimates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system transforms fuel planning from a conservative parameter-based approach to a data-driven parameter optimization approach. This changes the cost-reliability trade-off by using actual performance data to determine minimal sufficient fuel loads.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Ease of operation

If model-based fuel estimation is used for fuel planning, then the ease of operation is improved, but the measurement precision of fuel requirements deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefuel planning easeVSAvoidfuel requirement precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system maintains ease of operation while improving precision by implementing feedback loops that automatically adjust fuel planning based on monitored actual consumption. This eliminates the need for manual recalibration while achieving precise fuel requirements through data-driven adaptation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary data collection and analysis to establish accurate fuel consumption models before actual mission planning. This preliminary action maintains ease of operation during execution while achieving high precision through pre-learned performance characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS9248914B2Managing fuel in aircraft
Publication Date: 2016.02.02 THE BOEING CO
  • US9248914B2 patent drawing
  • US9248914B2 patent drawing
  • US9248914B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and apparatus for managing aircraft. Data about components for the aircraft is identified. Fuel efficiency of the aircraft is identified using the data about the components for the aircraft and a model of the aircraft. The model of the aircraft identifies fuel use. The aircraft is managed using the fuel efficiency identified for the aircraft.