Aircraft Ice Protection Optimization via Real-Time Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Aircraft ice protection systems face inefficiencies in managing power consumption and optimizing operation in varying icing conditions, particularly in severe conditions where power-intensive modes are reserved for critical areas but often not needed.

Innovation Solution

An ice protection system that utilizes ice-detection data, such as liquid water content and mean droplet size, along with other inputs to optimize the operation of heating elements and deicing cycles, allowing for reduced power usage and targeted protection of aircraft surfaces.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If power-intensive evaporative anti-icing modes are used to protect critical aircraft areas, then ice protection reliability is improved, but power consumption increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveice protection reliabilityVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies different protection strategies to different aircraft regions based on their criticality. Critical areas receive evaporative anti-icing protection when needed, while non-critical areas use less power-intensive methods or accept higher ice accumulation tolerance, optimizing the balance between protection reliability and power consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The ice protection system dynamically adjusts its operation mode and power levels based on real-time sensor inputs including liquid water content, mean droplet size, temperature, and aircraft state. This allows the system to transition between different protection intensities matching the actual icing severity rather than operating at fixed high power levels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If ice protection systems operate continuously at high power levels, then ice protection effectiveness is maintained, but energy efficiency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveice protection effectivenessVSAvoidenergy efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs periodic deicing cycles rather than continuous high-power operation. Heating elements are activated in timed cycles based on ice accumulation rate and aircraft state, providing sufficient ice removal while allowing energy dissipation during off-cycles, thereby improving energy efficiency while maintaining protection effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors icing conditions through sensors measuring liquid water content, droplet size, temperature, and ice accumulation. This feedback is used by the optimization algorithm to adjust power levels and deicing cycle timing in real-time, ensuring adequate protection while minimizing energy consumption by reducing power when conditions permit.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Productivity

If the system uses detailed ice-detection data and optimization algorithms, then operational optimization improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational optimizationVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The optimization algorithm serves multiple functions: it processes diverse sensor inputs (liquid water content, droplet size, temperature, aircraft state), determines appropriate protection strategies for different aircraft regions, coordinates deicing cycles, and manages power distribution. This multi-functionality consolidates what could be separate complex systems into a single integrated algorithm, improving operational optimization while controlling overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system achieves substantial power savings by reducing power to evaporative anti-icing devices when conditions are not severe and optimizes ice protection by coordinating deicing cycles with ice thickness, ensuring effective protection while minimizing energy consumption.

Implementation Method 1

The ice protection devices 21-26 can each comprise a heating element which converts electric power into heat

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectJoule heating: Joule Heating

Data Source

PatentUS9555894B2Aircraft ice protection optimization based on ice-detection input
Publication Date: 2017.01.31 GOODRICH CORP
  • US9555894B2 patent drawing
  • US9555894B2 patent drawing
  • US9555894B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An aircraft ice protection system (10) comprises an ice protection device (21), an onboard power source (30), a supply line (31) from the power source (30) to the device (21), a controller (41) which controls the line (31), and an optimizer (50) which conveys operation-optimizing instructions (51) to the controller (41). An ice detector (60) provides an input (70) to the optimizer (50) and this ice-condition input (70) is used to generate the operation-optimizing instructions (51).