Aircraft Stabilizing Device In-Flight Parameter Adjustment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for stabilizing the flying attitude of remote-controlled fixed-wing aircraft are time-consuming, inaccurate, and require multiple landings to adjust parameters, making them inefficient and risky.

Innovation Solution

A method and device that allow for quick and easy adjustment of parameters during flight using a stabilizing device with a transmitter and receiver, enabling operation in both stabilizing and parameter adjustment modes, allowing for real-time adjustment of parameters for multiple axes without the need for intermediate landings, using a multi-axis gyro sensor and proportional adjustment signals.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If parameters are adjusted by repeatedly launching and landing the aircraft, then parameter adjustment capability is achieved, but time consumption increases and operational efficiency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparameter adjustment capabilityVSAvoidtime consumption for parameter adjustment
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by establishing a reference flying attitude and measuring reference sensor signals before flight. During flight, parameter adjustment is achieved by comparing current sensor signals with the pre-stored reference signals, eliminating the need for repeated take-offs and landings. The reference data is prepared in advance and used as a baseline for automatic parameter optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables self-service by allowing the aircraft to automatically adjust its own parameters during flight without pilot intervention or ground-based adjustment. The on-board computer automatically compares sensor signals with reference values and modifies control parameters in real-time, making the aircraft self-tuning and eliminating time-consuming manual adjustment cycles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Ease of operation

If manual counter control signals are used to maintain flying attitude, then control capability is achieved, but control accuracy deteriorates due to unidentifiable air movements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol capabilityVSAvoidflying attitude measurement accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback by continuously monitoring sensor signals during flight and comparing them with pre-stored reference signals. The on-board computer processes the difference between current and reference attitudes to automatically generate correction signals, creating a closed-loop control system that compensates for air movements and maintains accurate flying attitude without pilot intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces manual mechanical control with an automated electronic control system. Instead of the pilot manually adjusting control surfaces based on visual observation, the system uses sensor data and on-board processing to automatically adjust control surfaces, substituting human reaction with faster, more precise electronic control that can detect and respond to air movements the pilot cannot perceive.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Manufacturing precision

If multiple landings are performed for parameter adjustment, then comprehensive parameter optimization is achieved, but operational reliability deteriorates due to increased crash risk

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparameter optimization precisionVSAvoidflight operation reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary measurement of reference sensor signals during a single flight before parameter adjustment begins. This reference data is stored and used throughout subsequent flights for parameter optimization, eliminating the need for repeated landings and reducing exposure to crash risks while maintaining comprehensive optimization capability through continuous comparison with the reference attitude.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables continuous parameter adjustment and optimization during flight without interruption or landing. The on-board computer continuously processes sensor signals and adjusts parameters in real-time, maintaining uninterrupted flight operation and eliminating the discontinuous take-off and landing cycles that increase crash risk, thereby ensuring both optimization precision and operational reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables rapid and precise adjustment of parameters during flight, eliminating the need for time-consuming take-off and landing maneuvers, and allows for stable flying attitude maintenance, enhancing control reliability and reducing the risk of accidents.

Implementation Method 1

a multi-axis gyro sensor for detecting an angular velocity and/or an orientation of the fixed-wing aircraft during a flight movement

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGyroscope: Gyroscope

Data Source

PatentUS9283490B1Device for stabilising a flying attitude of a remote-controlled fixed-wing aircraft
Publication Date: 2016.03.15 POWERBOX SYST
  • US9283490B1 patent drawing
  • US9283490B1 patent drawing
  • US9283490B1 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention relates to a method for adjusting parameters in a stabilizing device (4) for stabilizing a flying attitude of a remote-controlled fixed-wing aircraft. To adjust a first parameter for a first axis, a first adjustment signal is transmitted from the transmitter (1) to the stabilizing device (4). The first parameter (P1) is stored during the flight as a result of a first memory signal transmitted from the transmitter (1). A second parameter (P2) for a second axis is then adjusted and stored in a similar manner.