Aluminum Alloy Precursor Composition for Crack-Free Fusion Processing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Aluminum 6061 alloys are prone to hot cracking and porosity during high-energy fusion processing due to vaporization of high vapor pressure constituents like magnesium and zinc, leading to altered compositions and reduced mechanical properties.

Innovation Solution

An aluminum alloy precursor composition with enriched magnesium content (2.5-5.0 wt.%) and minimized zinc content (0.005 wt.%) is used, along with grain refiners like titanium and boron, and a dual-energy beam process to disrupt dendritic structures and enhance agitation in the melt pool, reducing hot cracking and porosity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If high-energy fusion processing is used to manufacture aluminum alloys, then productivity and manufacturing capability are improved, but hot cracking and porosity occur due to vaporization of high vapor pressure constituents

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing capabilityVSAvoiddefect-free quality
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent modifies the chemical composition parameters of the aluminum alloy precursor material by enriching magnesium content to 2.5-5.0 wt.% and minimizing zinc content to 0.005 wt.%. This parameter change compensates for vaporization losses during high-energy fusion processing, allowing the final alloy to meet compositional specifications while maintaining defect-free quality and high productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-enriching the magnesium content and pre-minimizing zinc content in the precursor material before fusion processing. This anticipates the vaporization of high vapor pressure constituents during processing and ensures the final alloy achieves the desired composition and quality without defects

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Stability of the object's composition

If magnesium content is increased to compensate for vaporization losses, then compositional specifications are met after processing, but hot cracking susceptibility increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompositional specificationVSAvoidhot cracking
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes multiple composition parameters simultaneously: enriching magnesium to 2.5-5.0 wt.%, minimizing zinc to 0.005 wt.%, and adding grain refiners (titanium 0.05-0.15 wt.% and boron 0.001-0.05 wt.%). This multi-parameter approach achieves compositional stability while the grain refiners counteract hot cracking by disrupting dendritic structures

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a composite alloy system that combines aluminum with optimized amounts of magnesium, zinc, silicon, copper, chromium, manganese, titanium, and boron. This composite composition achieves compositional stability after processing while the synergistic interaction of elements, particularly grain refiners, prevents hot cracking

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Object-affected harmful factors

If zinc content is minimized to reduce porosity, then porosity is reduced, but compositional control becomes more difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveporosityVSAvoidcompositional control
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent sets zinc content to a precise minimum value of 0.005 wt.% and establishes specific ranges for all other alloying elements. This precise parameter control, combined with enriching magnesium and adding grain refiners, reduces porosity while maintaining manufacturable compositional control through defined specification ranges

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The approach results in defect-free, high-strength aluminum alloys that meet compositional specifications, with improved ductility and mechanical properties, effectively addressing hot cracking and porosity issues in fusion processing.

Implementation Method 1

exposing the aluminum alloy precursor material to at least one direct energy source sufficient to heat and liquefy the precursor material

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEnergy beam heating: Heating

Implementation Method 2

exposing the aluminum alloy precursor material to at least one direct energy source sufficient to heat and liquefy the precursor material

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMelting: Melting

Implementation Method 3

solidifying the melt pool to form the aluminum alloy article

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSolidification: Freezing

Implementation Method 4

dual-energy beam process to disrupt dendritic structures and enhance agitation in the melt pool

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectBeam-induced agitation: Vibration

Data Source

PatentEP3596242B1Method for fusion processing aluminum alloy and aluminum alloy precursor material
Publication Date: 2022.01.26 RAYTHEON CO
  • EP3596242B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3596242B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3596242B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

An aluminum alloy precursor composition and method for fusion processing is provided which reduces hot cracking, improves compositional control, reduces porosity, and/or enhances the mechanical properties of the fusion processed article. The precursor material and fusion process using the same may be utilized for forming an article that meets compositional specifications for aluminum 6061 alloy, while minimizing defects and meeting desired strength and ductility requirements. The fusion process may include a leading energy beam for liquefying the precursor material to form a melt pool, and a trailing energy beam directed toward a trailing region of the melt pool. The trailing energy beam may be configured to enhance agitation and/or redistribution of liquid in the melt pool to prevent hot cracking, reduce porosity, or improve other characteristics of the solidified part. The method also may improve processing parameters, such as adjusting vacuum level to prevent volatilization of alloying elements.