Angled 3D Printed Composite Fittings for Stronger Tube Joints

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing composite tube fittings for aircraft and spacecraft are heavy due to being machined from titanium, and 3D printing at 0 degrees results in insufficient torsional, axial, and horizontal strengths without support structures, leading to waste and post-processing requirements.

Innovation Solution

3D printing composite tube fittings at an angle between 10 and 65 degrees, with a complementary chamfered surface, and incorporating an internally threaded insert to enhance structural integrity and reduce weight.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If fittings are machined from titanium, then strength and structural integrity are achieved, but weight increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefitting strengthVSAvoidfitting weight
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the manufacturing method from traditional machining to 3D printing, and alters the material composition by incorporating continuous fibers (carbon, Kevlar, or fiberglass) into the polymer matrix. This composite approach maintains structural integrity while significantly reducing weight compared to solid titanium fittings.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The fitting is constructed as a composite material system combining polymer matrix (nylon or onyx) with continuous reinforcement fibers (carbon fiber, Kevlar, or fiberglass). This composite structure achieves the required strength-to-weight ratio by leveraging the high tensile strength of fibers while maintaining the formability and light weight of polymer materials.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Ease of manufacture

If 3D printing is performed at 0 degrees, then manufacturing simplicity is maintained, but torsional, axial, and horizontal strengths become insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprinting simplicityVSAvoidtorsional and axial strength
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a new dimensional parameter - the print angle - to optimize mechanical properties. By printing at angles between 10-65 degrees rather than 0 degrees, the layers are oriented to better resist torsional, axial, and horizontal loads. This angular orientation distributes stress more effectively across the layered structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies different print angles to different regions or orientations of the fitting to optimize local mechanical properties. The complementary chamfered surface geometry is specifically designed to work with the angled printing approach, creating localized stress distribution patterns that enhance overall structural integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Reliability

If support structures are used during 3D printing, then structural integrity during printing is maintained, but waste increases and post-processing requirements arise

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprinting structural integrityVSAvoidmaterial waste
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

By changing the print angle to 10-65 degrees, the patent inherently provides self-supporting geometry during the printing process. The angled layer deposition creates a structure that supports itself without requiring additional support materials, eliminating waste and reducing post-processing needs while maintaining structural integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The angled 3D printed fittings achieve improved torsional, axial, and horizontal strengths while minimizing waste and reducing weight, with axial strengths of at least 9000 lbf, and composite tube assemblies achieving at least 300 lbf.

Implementation Method 1

the body is 3D printed by laying successive horizontal layers of material with the first axis at an angle between 10 degrees and 65 degrees from a vertical axis (i.e., a print angle)

Methodology Applied
Scientific Effect3D Printing: 3D Printing

Implementation Method 2

the material is at least one of an onyx, plastic, or nylon reinforced with a continuous fiber

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectComposite Materials: Composite Materials

Data Source

PatentEP4613483A13D printed fittings and methods of forming the same
Publication Date: 2025.09.10 AVTECHTYEE
  • EP4613483A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4613483A1 patent drawingFigure 2~5
  • EP4613483A1 patent drawingFigure 3~4

AI summary

A 3D printed fitting includes an axially extending body having a first end opposite a second end. The body extends along a first axis, and the body is 3D printed by laying horizontal successive horizontal layers of material with the first axis at a print angle between 0 degrees and 65 degrees from a vertical axis.