Angled-Fin Conduit Retention for Bidirectional Pull Resistance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing fluid line securement devices in clinical settings provide limited pull resistance, accommodate a narrow range of conduit diameters, and require frequent adjustments, often causing skin irritation and unintended removal, which can lead to adverse clinical outcomes.

Innovation Solution

A conduit securement device with resiliently deformable fins angled at acute angles to the longitudinal direction, providing enhanced pull resistance and accommodating a range of conduit diameters, while minimizing interference with patient movement and other medical apparatus.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If adhesive or tape is used to secure a fluid line, then the line can be readily adapted to different types or diameters, but hair, sweat or other fluids can weaken the adhesion and only limited pull resistance can be achieved

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to different line typesVSAvoidpull resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces adhesive/tape-based securement with a mechanical securement system using a retention device that physically retains the line through friction and geometric constraints. The device uses a channel with resilient blades that apply lateral pressure to the line, providing mechanical retention instead of chemical adhesion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs curved or angled surfaces within the retention device channel to create effective retention. The resilient blades are disposed at an angle to the channel, creating a wedge-like effect that converts lateral line movement into increased friction and normal force against the line, enhancing pull resistance through geometric design rather than adhesive strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

2Adaptability or versatility

If adhesive or tape is used to secure a fluid line, then the line can be readily adapted to different types or diameters, but these measures must be constantly renewed and can cause skin irritation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to different line typesVSAvoidskin irritation
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces adhesive/tape-based securement with a mechanical securement system using a retention device that physically retains the line through friction and geometric constraints. The device uses a channel with resilient blades that apply lateral pressure to the line, providing mechanical retention instead of chemical adhesion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The retention device acts as an intermediary between the line and the patient's skin. Instead of adhesive directly contacting and potentially irritating the skin, the mechanical device provides retention through its structure, with only minimal contact elements touching the skin, thereby eliminating skin irritation while maintaining adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Adaptability or versatility

If resilient clamping elements are oriented perpendicular to the channel, then the device can accommodate various line diameters, but this limits the surface area that contacts a conduit and the amount of pull resistance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccommodation of line diametersVSAvoidpull resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs asymmetric positioning of the resilient blades within the channel. The blades are disposed at an angle to the channel rather than symmetrically perpendicular, creating an asymmetric force distribution that enhances pull resistance in the direction of line tension while maintaining the ability to accommodate various line diameters through the compliance of the resilient material.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs curved or angled surfaces within the retention device channel to create effective retention. The resilient blades are disposed at an angle to the channel, creating a wedge-like effect that converts lateral line movement into increased friction and normal force against the line, enhancing pull resistance through geometric design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The device effectively reduces the risk of unintended removal and disruption of medical conduits by distributing forces along the conduit length, offering improved pull resistance and adaptability to various conduit sizes and orientations.

Implementation Method 1

a first array of resiliently deformable fins disposed along the channel extending from at least a first side and an opposite second side of the channel; and a second array of resiliently deformable fins disposed along the channel

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElastic deformation: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentEP4380664B1Conduit securement device
Publication Date: 2025.04.02 JAVELO HEALTH LTD
  • EP4380664B1 patent drawingFigure 1a~1b
  • EP4380664B1 patent drawingFigure 1c
  • EP4380664B1 patent drawingFigure 2

AI summary

P325732WO ABSTRACT Title: Conduit Securement Device (Figure 14(a)) Disclosed is a conduit securement device, for securing a conduit such as a medical conduit. The device has a body defining a channel for receiving the a conduit and two arrays of fins 5 extending from opposed sides of the channel and oriented at an acute angle in relation to a longitudinal direction along the channel. The arrays of fins are oriented in opposite directions in relation to one another. A conduit inserted in the channel resiliently deforms at least the ends of the fins, and friction between the fins and the conduit provide resistance to longitudinal motion of the conduit along the channel, i.e. "pull resistance", in either direction.10