Animation Engine Motion Amplifiers for Cartoon Physics

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional computer-based animation tools are inefficient for creating cartoon-style animations as they rely on physical models that do not accurately represent cartoon physics and use terminology unfamiliar to animators, making it difficult to achieve realistic and exaggerated motion effects.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method that generates animations by using motion amplifiers such as squash-and-stretch, arc, anticipation, follow-through, and secondary motion to deform and animate sketch elements, allowing animators to create cartoon-style animations without relying on complex physical simulations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Extent of automation

If conventional computer-based tools rely on physical models to automate animation, then automation extent increases, but reliability of cartoon-style animation decreases because physical models must follow laws of physics which cartoon animations do not obey

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomation of animation processVSAvoidaccuracy for cartoon-style animation
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces physics-based mechanical models with animation-based computational models. Instead of using physical simulations that obey laws of physics, the system uses motion capture data and animation principles (such as inverse kinematics and motion blending) to generate cartoon-style animations that can deliberately violate physical laws for artistic effect.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the fundamental parameters from physical quantities (mass, force, acceleration) to animation-specific parameters (keyframes, interpolation curves, motion amplifiers). This allows the system to automate the animation process while maintaining artistic control and enabling non-physical motion characteristics typical of cartoon styles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Device complexity

If conventional tools use physics and graphics processing terminology, then device complexity is reduced, but ease of operation worsens because animators do not use this terminology and find such tools difficult or impossible to use

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimplicity of tool structureVSAvoidusability for animators
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent copies and adapts the familiar terminology and workflow from traditional animation tools rather than requiring users to learn new physics-based terminology. The interface uses animation-specific concepts such as keyframes, timelines, and motion curves that animators already understand, making the tool immediately accessible to professionals in the field.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a universal tool that can handle both traditional 2D animation workflows and 3D animation tasks using consistent animation terminology. The system supports multiple animation styles and techniques through a unified interface that speaks the language of animators regardless of the specific animation technique being employed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If animators manually create traditional cartoon-style animations with exaggerated elements, then reliability of animation quality is improved, but productivity decreases because the number of images required can be exceedingly large

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequality and realism of animationVSAvoidnumber of images created per time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses motion capture technology to record real-world movements in advance, which are then processed and adapted for cartoon-style animation. This preliminary capture of motion data eliminates the need for frame-by-frame manual drawing, dramatically increasing productivity while maintaining the quality of exaggerated animated movements through post-processing amplification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements dynamic motion amplifiers that can exaggerate movements in real-time during the animation process. These amplifiers dynamically adjust motion parameters such as speed, amplitude, and timing to create cartoon-style exaggeration without requiring manual redrawing of each frame, thus maintaining both quality and productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS10403020B2Techniques for generating dynamic illustrations using principles of animation
Publication Date: 2019.09.03 AUTODESK INC
  • US10403020B2 patent drawing
  • US10403020B2 patent drawing
  • US10403020B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An animation engine is configured to apply motion amplifiers to sketches received from an end-user in order to create exaggerated, cartoon-style animation. The animation engine receives a sketch input from the end-user as well as a selection of one or more motion amplifiers. The animation engine also receives one or more control sketches that indicate how the selected motion amplifiers are applied to the sketch input. The animation engine projects the sketch input onto a sketch grid to create a sketch element, and then animates the sketch element by deforming the underlying sketch grid based on the control sketches. The animation engine then interpolates the sketch input, based on the deformations of the sketch grid, to animate the sketch. In this manner, the animation engine exposes an intuitive set of tools that allows end-users to easily apply the well-known Principles of Animation.