Anticipated Activation Point for RNP AR Flight Monitoring

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current automated flight management systems for RNP AR operations activate monitoring too late, preventing crews from evaluating aircraft capabilities sufficiently upstream of the operation, thereby limiting the ability to adopt alternative strategies if necessary.

Innovation Solution

The method involves calculating and activating an anticipated activation point upstream of the actual activation point, allowing for early evaluation of aircraft capabilities and enabling the implementation of alternative strategies if the foreseen operation is impossible.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of time

If monitoring is activated at the application point (current practice), then the system maintains simplicity and follows standard activation protocols, but the crew cannot evaluate aircraft capabilities sufficiently upstream of the operation

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveTime for crew to evaluate aircraft capabilitiesVSAvoidMonitoring activation system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system calculates an anticipated activation point upstream of the application point and activates monitoring at this earlier location. This preliminary activation allows the crew to evaluate aircraft capabilities before the operation begins, providing time to implement alternative strategies if needed, while maintaining the existing monitoring architecture without adding significant complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Adaptability or versatility

If monitoring is activated upstream of the application point, then the crew can evaluate aircraft capabilities in advance and implement alternative strategies, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveCrew ability to choose alternative strategiesVSAvoidAutomatic management system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary calculation of the anticipated activation point based on the application point and activates monitoring earlier, enabling the crew to assess aircraft capabilities and select alternative strategies before the operation begins. The calculation uses existing flight management data without requiring additional complex subsystems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The flight management system automatically calculates the anticipated activation point and manages the monitoring activation timeline without requiring manual crew intervention. The system self-adjusts the activation point based on the defined upstream distance, reducing the operational burden on the crew while enhancing adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Ease of operation

If the monitoring activation point is delayed, then the system operates with standard procedures, but alternative strategies cannot be implemented timely

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveOperational procedure simplicityVSAvoidSafety guarantee for RNP AR operations
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system activates monitoring at an anticipated point upstream of the application point, providing the crew with advance evaluation time to ensure aircraft capabilities meet safety requirements. This preliminary activation maintains operational simplicity while enhancing safety by enabling timely detection of capability deficiencies and implementation of alternative strategies.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS9785144B2Method and device for automatically managing air operations requiring a guarantee of navigation and guidance performance of an aircraft
Publication Date: 2017.10.10 AIRBUS OPERATIONS (SAS)
  • US9785144B2 patent drawing
  • US9785144B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Method and device for automatically managing air operations requiring a guarantee of navigation and guidance performance of an aircraft. The device for automatically managing at least one air operation comprises activatable monitoring of the air operation, a computation unit configured to automatically calculate an anticipated activation point as a function of the application point of the air operation, this anticipated activation point being defined upstream of the application point in the direction of flight of the aircraft, and an activation unit configured to automatically activate monitoring and a display when the aircraft reaches, during its flight, the anticipated activation point.