Anticipatory Vehicle Control System for Convoy Hazard Evaluation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing vehicle control systems lack effective methods to enhance safety during obstacle avoidance in vehicle convoys, particularly when the view of oncoming traffic is restricted, leading to unreliable hazard evaluations and increased accident risks.

Innovation Solution

A method and device for controlling an ego-vehicle that determines and adapts its driving strategy based on the surroundings, compares and modifies its strategy with the vehicle in front, performs hazard evaluations, and implements emergency strategies like reduced speed or braking to avoid collisions, while considering the dimensions of the lead vehicle and the risk of oncoming traffic, ensuring the ego-vehicle stays in its lane and avoids increased accident risks.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the ego-vehicle adopts the driving strategy of the vehicle driving in front during obstacle avoidance, then the coordination and safety in the vehicle convoy is improved, but the reliability of hazard evaluation deteriorates when the view of oncoming traffic is restricted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety in vehicle convoyVSAvoidhazard evaluation reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously monitors the driving strategies of the lead vehicle and feeds this information back to the ego-vehicle's control system. When the lead vehicle executes an avoidance maneuver, the ego-vehicle detects this strategy and adjusts its own behavior accordingly, creating a feedback loop that improves convoy coordination while maintaining safety through continuous evaluation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary hazard evaluation before fully adopting the lead vehicle's avoidance strategy. By assessing the situation in advance and comparing it with stored hazard patterns, the system can anticipate potential risks and prepare appropriate responses, reducing the loss of information during critical decision-making moments

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Adaptability or versatility

If the ego-vehicle performs avoidance maneuver onto the other lane, then the obstacle avoidance capability is improved, but the risk of collision with oncoming traffic increases when view is restricted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveobstacle avoidance capabilityVSAvoidcollision risk with oncoming traffic
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

Before executing an avoidance maneuver onto the other lane, the system performs a preliminary check for oncoming traffic by analyzing available sensor data and comparing it with stored hazard patterns. This preliminary anti-action prevents the ego-vehicle from entering situations where collision risk is high, countering the potential harmful effect before it can materialize

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary hazard evaluation layer between the decision to avoid obstacles and the actual execution of the avoidance maneuver. This intermediary layer processes sensor information, compares it with known hazard patterns, and mediates the final decision, reducing the direct link between obstacle detection and risky avoidance actions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If the ego-vehicle reduces speed to improve hazard evaluation, then the safety is improved, but the productivity of the vehicle convoy deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehazard evaluation accuracyVSAvoidvehicle convoy efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of continuously reducing speed, the system applies partial speed reduction only when and where hazard evaluation is needed. By selectively slowing down during critical evaluation moments and maintaining normal speed otherwise, the system achieves adequate hazard assessment accuracy while minimizing the impact on convoy productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements periodic hazard evaluation at strategically chosen intervals rather than continuous speed reduction. This periodic approach allows the ego-vehicle to maintain higher average speeds while still performing necessary safety assessments, balancing reliability and productivity through time-based segmentation of evaluation actions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Data Source

PatentUS10618515B2Anticipatory control system of a motor vehicle
Publication Date: 2020.04.14 CONTI TEMIC MICROELECTRONIC GMBH
  • US10618515B2 patent drawing
  • US10618515B2 patent drawing
  • US10618515B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The disclosure relates to a control system and to a device for an ego-vehicle in a vehicle convoy in the case of the avoidance of an obstacle. Before the ego-vehicle follows an adopted avoidance trajectory of a vehicle driving in front, a hazard evaluation of the driving strategy of the vehicle driving in front is performed and the avoidance trajectory is modified on the basis of the result of the hazard evaluation.