Arm Stopper Mechanism Reducing Bending Load on Steering Output Shaft

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing arm stopper mechanisms in motor-driven power steering apparatuses for ATV's apply excessive bending loads to the output shaft due to the angle configuration between the striking surfaces of the steering arm and the contact surfaces of the stopper, leading to increased stress on bearings and housing components.

Innovation Solution

The arm stopper mechanism is redesigned with a configuration where the angle between the contact surfaces of the stopper is greater than the angle between the striking surfaces of the steering arm, allowing the input load vector and striking load vector to cancel each other out, thereby reducing the bending load applied to the output shaft.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Force

If the angle between contact surfaces of the stopper is made equal to or less than the angle between striking surfaces of the steering arm, then the stopping function is achieved, but excessive bending load is applied to the output shaft

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebending load on output shaftVSAvoidstopping function
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by specifically setting the angle between contact surfaces of the stopper to be greater than the angle between striking surfaces of the steering arm, and greater than or equal to 90 degrees. This angular parameter modification transforms the force distribution, allowing the input load vector and striking load vector to cancel each other, thereby reducing bending load on the output shaft while maintaining the stopping function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If the stopper contacts the striking surface at a smaller angle, then the stopping effectiveness is improved, but stress on bearings and housing components increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestopping effectivenessVSAvoidstress on bearings and housing
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStress or pressure

Solution Approach 1:

The patent modifies the angular parameter of the stopper contact surfaces to be greater than the striking surface angle and at least 90 degrees. This parameter change redirects the force transmission path, reducing stress concentration on bearings and housing components while preserving stopping effectiveness through proper vector cancellation of loads.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Volume of moving object

If the steering arm size is reduced, then the overall apparatus size is minimized, but the bending load resistance is compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesteering arm sizeVSAvoidbending load resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent enables steering arm size reduction by implementing the specific angular configuration of the stopper. The geometric parameter change (angle ≥ 90 degrees and greater than striking surface angle) optimizes force distribution, allowing a compact steering arm design that maintains adequate bending load resistance through improved load vector cancellation rather than increased size.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS9393988B2Arm stopper mechanism and steering apparatus using same
Publication Date: 2016.07.19 ASTEMO LTD
  • US9393988B2 patent drawing
  • US9393988B2 patent drawing
  • US9393988B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A steering arm includes an output shaft hole into which an output shaft is fitted; two tie rod holes to which tie rods are respectively attached; and two striking surfaces that strike against a stopper. The stopper includes two contract surfaces. An angle formed by the two contact surfaces of the stopper is greater than an angle formed by the two striking surfaces of the steering arm, and is greater than or equal to 90°.