Articulated Vehicle Docking Control With Nonlinear MPC

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current technologies face challenges in automating the docking maneuver of articulated vehicles, particularly due to the need for high precision, sensitivity to modeling errors, and difficulties in handling forward and backward motions.

Innovation Solution

A multi-stage path and motion planning system that uses a sampling-based motion planning algorithm followed by a graph expansion stage with hard constraints to generate a feasible path for automated docking of articulated vehicles, incorporating a real-time reference tracking controller and nonlinear model predictive control.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If standard n-trailer model with feedback linearization is used for controlling articulated vehicles, then powerful nonlinear feedback laws can be achieved, but the system becomes extremely sensitive to modeling errors and cannot easily incorporate state constraints

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol system performanceVSAvoidsensitivity to modeling errors
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a model predictive control (MPC) framework that continuously measures the actual state of the articulated vehicle and adjusts control inputs based on predicted future states. This closed-loop feedback mechanism compensates for modeling errors by comparing predicted trajectories with actual vehicle behavior and correcting deviations in real-time, thereby reducing sensitivity to inaccuracies in the n-trailer model while maintaining the ability to incorporate state constraints through explicit constraint formulation in the optimization problem.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Device complexity

If linear MPC is used for path tracking, then control simplicity is maintained, but the system is limited to straight forward motions and cannot handle forward and backward maneuvers

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol system simplicityVSAvoidmotion capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from static linear MPC to dynamic nonlinear MPC that adapts to the changing operational modes of the articulated vehicle. The controller incorporates time-varying system matrices and constraints that change based on whether the vehicle is in forward or backward motion. This dynamic adaptation allows the same control framework to handle diverse maneuvers including straight-line cruising, curved path following, and reverse parking operations, thereby achieving versatility without sacrificing the systematic structure of MPC.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Extent of automation

If automated docking control is implemented, then labor training costs are reduced, but the system requires extremely high precision to avoid infrastructure damage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomated docking capabilityVSAvoidpositioning accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs a two-stage control approach where the first stage uses sampling-based motion planning to generate a coarse docking trajectory that brings the vehicle close to the target position. The second stage then refines this trajectory using model predictive control with tight state constraints that explicitly limit positioning errors. This preliminary action followed by refinement allows the automated system to achieve the extremely high precision required for safe docking while maintaining automation benefits, as the constraint formulation proactively prevents errors before they cause infrastructure damage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Adaptability or versatility

If many trailers are connected in series without active steering, then vehicle configuration flexibility is increased, but tracking performance is significantly affected by disturbances

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevehicle configuration flexibilityVSAvoidtracking performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent models the articulated vehicle as a segmented n-trailer system where each trailer is treated as a separate dynamic entity with its own state variables and control influences. The model predictive control framework formulates the overall tracking problem as a hierarchical optimization that independently considers each trailer segment while accounting for their coupled dynamics. This segmentation approach allows the system to handle disturbances on individual trailers by locally optimizing control inputs for affected segments, thereby maintaining reliable tracking performance even when many trailers are connected in series without active steering on the trailers themselves.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS12286151B1System and method for controlling motion of articulated vehicles
Publication Date: 2025.04.29 MITSUBISHI ELECTRIC RESEARCH LABORATORIES INC
  • US12286151B1 patent drawing
  • US12286151B1 patent drawing
  • US12286151B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for controlling motion of an articulated vehicle with one or multiple trailers is described. The system is configured to infer the state of a vehicle, determine a motion path with forward motions and backward motions for the vehicle based on the state, and formulate an optimal control problem for optimizing the motion path. The optimal control problem comprises an integral tracking error function indicating integral tracking error based on motion cusps relating to the motion path. The motion cusps indicate switching between forward motion and backward motion. The motion path is optimized over a prediction horizon based on solving the optimal control problem. A control command is generated for the vehicle based on the optimized motion path and a vehicle model, and the motion of the articulated vehicle is controlled based on the control command thereby changing its state.