Post-Silicon ASIC Layout Recovery for DRC-Based Verification

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

ASIC design flow faces challenges in post-manufacturing verification and validation due to the inability to alter functionality or fix bugs, leading to potential security threats and reputation risks, especially in fabless design processes where there is a disconnect between design and manufacturing.

Innovation Solution

Utilizing open-source tools and DRC rules on post-silicon layouts to perform delayering, device extraction, and rectilinearization, creating a synthetic DRC deck to correct and align shapes, and derive a netlist for accurate verification and validation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If ASIC design flow uses traditional closed-source tools and processes, then manufacturing precision and reliability are maintained through proprietary control, but flexibility and adaptability for post-manufacturing verification are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepost-manufacturing verification accuracyVSAvoiddesign flow flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a digital copy of the physical ASIC layout by delayering the manufactured chip and reconstructing the layout geometry. This copy enables verification without modifying the actual device, maintaining reliability while allowing extensive analysis and adaptation for different verification scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary process layer that translates between the physical manufactured layout and the design verification requirements. This intermediary enables accurate verification by bridging the gap between fabrication reality and design specifications without requiring changes to either the manufacturing process or the verification tools.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If ASIC design flow implements comprehensive verification processes, then reliability and bug detection improve, but time consumption and complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebug detection capabilityVSAvoidverification time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary delayering and layout reconstruction before verification begins. By preparing the digital layout copy in advance with accurate geometric information, the actual verification process can proceed more quickly without needing to perform time-consuming measurements during verification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual measurement and verification methods with automated computational processes. The delayering and layout extraction are performed through automated image processing and geometric reconstruction algorithms, significantly reducing the time required compared to manual verification techniques.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Adaptability or versatility

If ASIC design flow uses open-source tools for delayering and layout extraction, then adaptability and cost-effectiveness improve, but manufacturing precision and measurement accuracy may deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetool flexibilityVSAvoidlayout extraction accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent adjusts the parameters and settings of open-source tools to optimize them for high-precision layout extraction. By carefully tuning parameters such as image processing thresholds, geometric reconstruction algorithms, and measurement tolerances, the system achieves accurate extraction while maintaining the adaptability benefits of open-source tools.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Measurement precision

If ASIC design flow performs detailed layout analysis and rectilinearization, then verification accuracy improves, but device complexity and processing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelayout verification accuracyVSAvoidprocessing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the layout analysis process into distinct segments: delayering individual metal layers, extracting geometric features, performing rectilinearization separately, and finally comparing with reference layouts. This segmentation allows each step to be optimized independently and reduces the complexity of any single processing stage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS20250342303A1ASIC design flow and obsolescence recovery through open-source tools and application of DRC rules on post-silicon layouts
Publication Date: 2025.11.06 BATTELLE MEMORIAL INST
  • US20250342303A1 patent drawing
  • US20250342303A1 patent drawing
  • US20250342303A1 patent drawing

AI summary

In an approach to generating a DRC clean design, a method includes generating successive images of an integrated circuit, each of the successive images being associated with a different one of a plurality of layers of the integrated circuit; determining a layout of the integrated circuit in response to the successive images; collecting at least one measurement of at least one feature in the layout; and modifying the layout in response to the at least one measurement.