Asphaltene Dispersant Evaluation via Inert Packing Columns

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Asphaltene precipitation in hydrocarbon-containing materials under elevated temperature and pressure conditions leads to issues such as pipeline plugging, reduced oil production, coke formation during thermal upgrading, and equipment fouling, necessitating effective methods to inhibit or prevent precipitation.

Innovation Solution

A method involving the use of inert packing columns subjected to temperature and pressure conditions, where asphaltene-precipitating solvents are used to capture and dissolve asphaltenes, allowing for the determination of asphaltene content before and after adding dispersant additives, enabling the selection and addition of effective dispersants to prevent precipitation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If dispersant additives are added to prevent asphaltene precipitation, then pipeline plugging and equipment fouling are reduced, but processing complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepipeline flow reliabilityVSAvoidprocessing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces complex mechanical testing systems with a simplified analytical chemistry approach using HPLC and UV-Vis spectroscopy to evaluate dispersant effectiveness, reducing equipment complexity while maintaining reliability assessment capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the evaluation parameters from complex field testing to measurable laboratory parameters (asphaltene concentration, UV-Vis absorbance, HPLC retention time) that can quantify dispersant effectiveness without requiring complex processing systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Object-affected harmful factors

If severe upgrading processes are applied to reduce undesirable components, then environmental compliance is improved, but processing cost and energy consumption increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveundesirable component contentVSAvoidprocessing energy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by evaluating and optimizing dispersant additives before severe upgrading processes, preventing asphaltene precipitation that would otherwise require energy-intensive coke removal and catalyst regeneration operations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent converts the harmful effect of asphaltenes (which typically require severe upgrading to remove) into a manageable issue by using dispersants to keep them in solution, allowing lighter, less energy-intensive processing while still achieving environmental compliance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

3Quantity of substance

If asphaltenes are allowed to precipitate under elevated temperature and pressure, then dispersant additive cost is reduced, but pipeline plugging and production loss occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedispersant additive concentrationVSAvoidoil production rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback by establishing a measurement system (HPLC-UV-Vis) that quantifies asphaltene behavior under reservoir conditions, allowing optimization of dispersant concentration to the minimum effective level rather than using excessive amounts

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the approach from preventing precipitation entirely to controlling it through measured parameters, using laboratory data to determine the optimal dispersant concentration that maintains productivity while minimizing additive usage

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method allows for the effective selection and addition of asphaltene dispersants, reducing precipitation, improving flow, and minimizing fouling in refinery components, thereby enhancing the processing of heavy crude oils and reducing operational costs.

Implementation Method 1

precipitating an amount of asphaltenes from a first hydrocarbon-containing material sample having solvated asphaltenes therein with one or more first asphaltene-precipitating mobile phase solvents

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPrecipitation: Precipitation

Implementation Method 2

dissolving an amount of the captured asphaltenes with one or more solvents to elute a fraction having dissolved asphaltenes therein

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSolvation: Solvation

Data Source

PatentUS9921205B2Method for determining the effectiveness of asphaltene dispersant additives for inhibiting or preventing asphaltene precipitation in a hydrocarbon-containing material subjected to elevated temperature and presssure conditions
Publication Date: 2018.03.20 CHEVRON USA INC
  • US9921205B2 patent drawing
  • US9921205B2 patent drawing
  • US9921205B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed herein is a method for determining the effectiveness of one or more asphaltene dispersant additives for inhibiting or preventing asphaltene precipitation in a hydrocarbon-containing material subjected to elevated temperature and pressure conditions.