Automatic Driving Control Device Route Change Validation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing automated driving systems do not adequately address route changes during ongoing automated driving, potentially causing discomfort to drivers and failing to prevent unintended changes in automated driving sections, especially when using auto-rerouting functions or manual intervention.

Innovation Solution

An automated driving control device that includes a navigation system and control unit to determine whether a route change is permissible based on differences in automated driving sections, allowing changes only if intended by the driver, and prohibiting changes if they would alter the automated driving section, thereby maintaining the current route if not permitted.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If auto-rerouting function is used to change route automatically during automated driving, then route guidance flexibility is improved, but driver comfort deteriorates due to unintended changes in automated driving sections

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveroute guidance flexibilityVSAvoiddriver comfort
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies preliminary anti-action by proactively preventing unwanted route changes. Before allowing a route change via auto-rerouting, the determination unit checks whether the new route's automated driving sections match the current route's sections. If they differ, the route change is blocked, thereby preventing the adverse effect of unintended changes in automated driving sections before they can occur.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback by continuously monitoring route changes and their impact on automated driving sections. When a route change is detected, the determination unit compares the automated driving sections of the current and new routes, and provides feedback by either permitting or prohibiting the route change based on this comparison, ensuring driver comfort is maintained.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Adaptability or versatility

If route change is allowed during automated driving, then navigation adaptability is improved, but reliability of automated driving section deteriorates due to unintended changes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenavigation adaptabilityVSAvoidautomated driving section stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system prevents reliability deterioration by proactively blocking route changes that would alter automated driving sections. The determination unit performs a preliminary check before allowing any route change, ensuring that only routes with identical automated driving sections are permitted, thereby maintaining the reliability and stability of the automated driving section.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback control by continuously monitoring route changes and comparing the automated driving sections. When a route change is detected, the feedback mechanism determines whether to permit or prohibit the change based on whether the automated driving sections remain consistent, thus maintaining reliability while allowing appropriate navigation adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Extent of automation

If automated driving mode is performed in any generated route, then driving automation extent is improved, but control precision deteriorates due to lack of route change validation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriving automation extentVSAvoidroute change control precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system enhances control precision through feedback by implementing a determination unit that validates route changes. Before the automated driving control unit executes a route change, the determination unit provides feedback by comparing the automated driving sections of the current and new routes, ensuring that only validated route changes are permitted, thereby maintaining high control precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies preliminary action by performing route change validation before executing the route change. The determination unit checks whether the new route's automated driving sections match the current route's sections before the automated driving control unit implements the change, ensuring that control precision is maintained through advance validation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS10795358B2Automatic driving control device
Publication Date: 2020.10.06 HONDA MOTOR CO LTD
  • US10795358B2 patent drawing
  • US10795358B2 patent drawing
  • US10795358B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Provided is an automatic driving control device advantageous for a vehicle or the like in which a route can be changed during movement to a destination. An automatic driving control device, wherein a navigation device is provided with a route generation unit for generating a second route which is difference from a first route on the basis of predetermined conditions, and a determination unit for determining whether to change from the first route to the second route when an automatic driving permissible interval included in the second route is different from the automatic driving permissible interval included in the first route. When the route has been determined by the determination unit to be changeable from the first route to the second route, a control unit executes an automatic driving mode in the automatic driving permissible interval included in the second route.