Autoinduction Protein Expression Dual Plasmid System

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current autoinduction systems for protein expression in bacterial cells require monitoring of growth phases and addition of exogenous inducers, which is time-consuming and costly, and are not compatible with phage display systems, making it difficult to express membrane and secreted proteins efficiently.

Innovation Solution

An autoinduction system using a dual genetic element approach, where a high copy number plasmid with a gene of interest under an inducible promoter is combined with a low copy number plasmid encoding a repressor, allowing autoinduction without exogenous inducers by leveraging endogenous agents in the culture medium, such as lactose or arabinose, and enabling seamless conversion from display to expression vectors.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If T7 promoter is used for high-level protein expression, then expression level is improved, but protein aggregation and host cell toxicity occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotein expression levelVSAvoidprotein aggregation and host cell toxicity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses a dual-plasmid system where T7 RNA polymerase expression is dynamically controlled by lactose induction. The T7 promoter drives high-level expression only after induction, while before induction the system maintains low expression to avoid aggregation and toxicity. This dynamic control allows the system to switch between low and high expression states as needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Productivity

If exogenous inducer addition is used for protein expression, then expression timing is controlled, but monitoring and manual intervention are required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveexpression control precisionVSAvoidmanual monitoring and inducer addition
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs an autoinduction system where the bacteria themselves consume lactose from the medium and convert it to allolactose, which automatically induces the lac promoter. This self-service mechanism eliminates the need for external monitoring and manual inducer addition, as the system self-regulates based on the bacteria's metabolic activity and lactose consumption rate.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback through the bacteria's lactose consumption rate. As bacteria grow and consume lactose, the decreasing lactose concentration and increasing allolactose concentration provide natural feedback that triggers induction at the optimal growth phase. This feedback loop automatically adjusts expression timing based on the actual growth state of the culture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Productivity

If strong inducible promoter is used for rapid protein production, then productivity is improved, but secretion system overload occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotein production rateVSAvoidsecretion system overload
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements periodic action by first allowing bacteria to grow and consume lactose during a lag phase, then inducing expression only after this preparation period. The induction occurs in a staged manner as allolactose accumulates progressively, allowing the secretion system to gradually adapt rather than being suddenly overwhelmed by high-level expression.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This system eliminates the need for inducer addition, reduces time and costs associated with induction, and allows for efficient expression of difficult-to-express proteins like membrane and secreted proteins, while being compatible with phage display systems.

Implementation Method 1

a repressor gene encoding a repressor which, upon expression, represses transcription from the inducible promoter

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTranscriptional repression:

Implementation Method 2

activation of transcription from the inducible promoter does not require addition of an exogenous inducer

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectInduction:

Data Source

PatentUS11485977B2Methods and systems for autoinduction of protein expression
Publication Date: 2022.11.01 ADAGENE INC
  • US11485977B2 patent drawing
  • US11485977B2 patent drawing
  • US11485977B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and systems for autoinduction of gene expression, without the need to add exogenous inducers. A dual genetic element system, which includes a first, high copy number genetic element comprising a first gene of interest that is under the control of an inducible promoter, and a second, low copy number genetic element comprising a gene encoding a transcriptional factor which, upon expression, regulates transcription from the inducible promoter, wherein activation of transcription from the inducible promoter does not require addition of an exogenous inducer.