Automated Driving Activation via Parameter Adjustment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Drivers face frustration and increased control effort when attempting to activate highly automated driving functions due to multiple driving parameter-specific conditions, such as speed and distance, which must be met before the function can be activated, leading to unnecessary and laborious manual adjustments.

Innovation Solution

A driving system with a second driving function that automatically adjusts relevant parameters, like speed and distance, to meet the permissibility range for activating the first highly automated driving function, allowing for seamless transition without additional driver input once conditions are met.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Extent of automation

If the driver manually adjusts driving parameters to meet activation conditions for highly automated driving function, then the function can be activated, but the control effort and time required increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomation of parameter adjustmentVSAvoiddriver control effort
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary adjustments of driving parameters (speed, distance, lane position) to meet the activation conditions for highly automated driving function before the driver attempts activation. This eliminates the need for the driver to manually adjust parameters, as the system has already prepared the vehicle state in advance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The driving system automatically monitors and adjusts its own operating parameters to satisfy activation conditions without requiring driver intervention. The system serves itself by autonomously managing parameter adjustments, freeing the driver from control effort.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If multiple driving parameter conditions are required for activation, then safety and appropriateness are improved, but the complexity of activation procedure increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveactivation condition validationVSAvoidactivation procedure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts and separates the complex parameter validation logic from the driver's task. The electronic control unit independently handles monitoring and validation of multiple driving parameters (speed, distance, lane position), leaving the driver with a simple activation command task.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The electronic control unit acts as an intermediary between the driver's activation request and the actual activation conditions. It mediates by automatically checking all parameter conditions and either enabling or preventing activation, simplifying the interface between driver intent and system requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Measurement precision

If the driver must continuously monitor and adjust parameters to meet activation conditions, then precise control is achieved, but time and attention are consumed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparameter condition monitoringVSAvoidactivation preparation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously monitors driving parameters in real-time, maintaining constant awareness of activation conditions without requiring periodic driver checks. This continuous automated monitoring eliminates the time the driver would otherwise spend repeatedly assessing whether conditions are met.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces the driver's manual monitoring and adjustment actions with automated electronic sensing and control. Sensors and control algorithms continuously track parameter values, substituting the driver's cognitive and physical efforts with automated electronic systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS11465651B2Activation of a driving function for automated driving with longitudinal and transverse guidance via a different driving function for automated driving with a low degree of automation
Publication Date: 2022.10.11 BAYERISCHE MOTOREN WERKE AG
  • US11465651B2 patent drawing
  • US11465651B2 patent drawing
  • US11465651B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A driving system for a motor vehicle includes a first driving function for automated driving with automated longitudinal and transverse guidance and a second driving function for automated driving with at least automated longitudinal guidance, or with at least automated transverse guidance. The second driving function has a lower degree of automation than the first driving function. The first driving function is available in a tolerance range. Starting from a driving state with an active second driving function and a value of the driving parameter outside the tolerance range, the driving system changes, when the second driving function is active, the value of the driving parameter in the direction of the tolerance range via automated longitudinal guidance or automated transverse guidance. The driving system then determines that the driving parameter satisfies a criterion with respect to the tolerance range.