Automated Slice Milling for Feature Tracking

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing slice-and-view technique in electron microscopy is inefficient due to the need to process large sections of samples to locate features of interest, especially for features with complex shapes like blood vessels or nerves, leading to significant time investment and extensive image data generation.

Innovation Solution

A method and apparatus that utilize machine vision to automatically determine the location and size of features, adjusting the FIB and SEM beams to make minimal cuts and image only the necessary areas, allowing for precise tracking and branching of features, and removing obstructions to improve access for imaging.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a large section of the sample is processed to locate the feature, then the feature location is guaranteed to be found, but the processing time and image data generation become excessive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeature location accuracyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by using the SEM to image the sample surface and identify the feature location before initiating FIB milling. This preliminary imaging step provides accurate feature location information that guides subsequent minimal milling operations, avoiding the need to process large sections of the sample.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback by continuously monitoring SEM images during the slice-and-view process to track the feature's position and adjust the FIB milling path accordingly. This real-time feedback mechanism ensures the feature is located and followed through the sample with minimal material removal, resolving the contradiction between reliable feature location and processing time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If a large section of the sample is processed to locate the feature, then the feature location is guaranteed to be found, but the amount of image data generated becomes excessive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeature location accuracyVSAvoidimage data volume
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary SEM imaging to locate the feature before FIB milling begins. This preliminary action provides the feature's precise location, allowing the system to limit subsequent imaging to only the minimal region required to follow the feature through the sample, thereby minimizing the total volume of image data generated.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system extracts only the essential information needed for feature location from the sample using SEM imaging, then uses this extracted information to guide focused FIB milling and limited imaging. This extraction approach avoids generating excessive image data by processing only the relevant portion of the sample.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Loss of information

If sequential slice milling and imaging is performed to reconstruct 3D features, then complete 3D information is obtained, but the processing time increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improve3D feature completenessVSAvoidreconstruction time
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the sample processing into distinct phases: initial SEM imaging to locate the feature, followed by sequential FIB slicing with intermittent SEM imaging to track the feature's path. This segmentation allows the system to obtain complete 3D information by following only the feature's trajectory through the sample, rather than processing the entire sample volume, thereby reducing processing time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies partial action by performing imaging and milling operations only on the portions of the sample that contain or are adjacent to the feature of interest. Rather than processing the entire sample, the system follows the feature's path through selective slicing and imaging, obtaining complete 3D information about the feature while minimizing the total processing time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

4Reliability

If the FIB and SEM beams are directed to a large area, then the feature is guaranteed to be captured, but the area that can be imaged with the SEM is limited by its field of view

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeature capture guaranteeVSAvoidSEM field of view
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The system transitions from a 2D field of view limitation to a 3D solution by using FIB milling to create sequential cross-sections at different depths. The SEM images each 2D slice, and the FIB progressively removes material to reveal deeper sections. This dimensional approach allows the system to capture the entire feature path through the sample volume using the SEM's limited field of view, maintaining reliability while working within the imaging constraints.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The system segments the feature's 3D path into multiple 2D cross-sectional slices that can be imaged by the SEM within its field of view limitations. By milling the sample in sequential steps and imaging each slice, the system captures the complete feature trajectory through depth, overcoming the SEM's limited lateral field of view while ensuring the feature is fully captured.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach reduces the time and material required for processing samples, enabling faster and more efficient reconstruction of 3D features by focusing on smaller, relevant areas and improving image resolution by minimizing redeposition and obstruction issues.

Implementation Method 1

the FIB cuts and slices a sample with high precision to reveal its 3D internal structures or features

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectIon beam sputtering: Sputtering

Implementation Method 2

After obtaining an image of the face by the SEM

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSecondary electron emission: Photoelectric Effect

Data Source

PatentUS9412559B2Automated slice milling for viewing a feature
Publication Date: 2016.08.09 FEI CO
  • US9412559B2 patent drawing
  • US9412559B2 patent drawing
  • US9412559B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and apparatus for performing a slice and view technique with a dual beam system. The feature of interest in an image of a sample is located by machine vision, and the area to be milled and imaged in a subsequent slice and view iteration is determined through analysis of data gathered by the machine vision at least in part. A determined milling area may be represented as a bounding box around a feature, which dimensions can be changed in accordance with the analysis step. The FIB is then adjusted accordingly to slice and mill a new face in the subsequent slice and view iteration, and the SEM images the new face. Because the present invention accurately locates the feature and determines an appropriate size of area to mill and image, efficiency is increased by preventing the unnecessary milling of substrate that does not contain the feature of interest.