Automated Vehicle Tailgating Response via Dynamic Gap Adjustment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Automated driving vehicles face challenges in handling tailgating situations due to their design prioritizing safety, which may lead to increased frequency of encounters with aggressive drivers, and the need to respond effectively in all driving scenarios.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of sensor data collection and processing techniques to detect tailgating situations and perform appropriate responses, such as lane changes and adjusting deceleration rates, using a combination of radar, LIDAR, cameras, and other sensors to assess and react to aggressive driving behaviors.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If automated driving control prioritizes safety by traveling more slowly, then collision risk is reduced, but frequency of encountering tailgaters increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollision risk reductionVSAvoidfrequency of tailgating encounters
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the time gap parameter based on detected tailgating conditions. When a tailgater is detected, the automated vehicle increases the time gap to a forward vehicle beyond the normal safety margin, creating a dynamic buffer that prevents collisions while managing the interaction with aggressive drivers. This dynamic adjustment allows the vehicle to maintain safety without being locked into a fixed slow speed regime.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Measurement precision

If automated vehicles use sensor data from multiple directions for precise positioning, then detection accuracy is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevehicle positioning accuracyVSAvoidsensor system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs a multi-functional sensor suite where radar, LIDAR, and cameras serve multiple purposes. These sensors not only detect tailgating situations and measure distances to surrounding vehicles but also provide positioning information and environmental mapping. By making the sensor system universal, the patent avoids adding dedicated specialized sensors for each function, thereby managing complexity while achieving high measurement precision through data fusion from multiple directions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enhances the safety and effectiveness of automated driving vehicles by accurately detecting tailgating and implementing precise responses that reduce collision risks and maintain safe distances, leveraging advanced sensor data processing beyond human capabilities.

Implementation Method 1

The sensors may include radar sensors, Light Detection and Ranging (LIDAR) sensors, and cameras

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRadar: Radar

Implementation Method 2

The sensors may include radar sensors, Light Detection and Ranging (LIDAR) sensors, and cameras

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLIDAR: LIDAR

Data Source

PatentUS10710580B2Tailgating situation handling by an automated driving vehicle
Publication Date: 2020.07.14 VALEO SCHALTER & SENSOREN GMBH
  • US10710580B2 patent drawing
  • US10710580B2 patent drawing
  • US10710580B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An apparatus and corresponding methods for detecting a tailgating situation involving a second motor vehicle behind an automated vehicle, and performing an automated safety routine in response to the detected tailgating situation. The tailgating situation is detected based on a simultaneous occurrence of two or more conditions involving an estimated time to collision, lateral offsets of both vehicles with respect to a center of a lane, activation of a turn signal blinker of the second motor vehicle, or flashing of a headlamp of the second motor vehicle. The safety routine includes performing a lane change to an adjacent lane. When no adjacent lanes are available for a lane change, a maximum permissible deceleration rate is decreased while increasing a time gap between the automated vehicle and a third motor vehicle directly in front of the automated vehicle by automatically adjusting an amount of at least one of acceleration or braking.