Autonomous Vehicle Control Error Detection and Parameter Compensation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Autonomous vehicle control systems do not account for physical changes and wear in vehicles, such as tire wear and brake wear, which can affect navigation, safety, and passenger comfort, leading to suboptimal performance over time.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method for an autonomous driving vehicle that monitors and adjusts control inputs based on real-time state data compared to stored data, using a state database to determine changes in vehicle performance and adjust parameters such as throttle, braking, and steering, and a server system that uses machine learning to analyze crowd-source data to update control input parameters and recommend maintenance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If autonomous vehicle control systems use fixed control inputs based on initial vehicle conditions, then the system complexity remains low, but the navigation accuracy and safety deteriorate over time due to vehicle wear and aging

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenavigation accuracyVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system transitions from static fixed control inputs to dynamic adaptive control inputs that automatically adjust based on real-time vehicle state monitoring and wear detection, allowing the system to maintain navigation accuracy while adapting to changing vehicle conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms by continuously monitoring vehicle state data, comparing actual performance against expected performance, and automatically adjusting control inputs based on detected deviations caused by wear and aging components

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Measurement precision

If the control system continuously monitors and adjusts control inputs in real-time, then the navigation accuracy and safety improve, but the computational load and system complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestate detection accuracyVSAvoidcomputational energy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies partial monitoring and adjustment by focusing computational resources on detecting specific wear patterns and adjusting only the control inputs that are most affected by vehicle degradation, rather than continuously optimizing all control parameters

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary analysis by establishing baseline vehicle performance characteristics and predicted wear patterns, allowing it to anticipate required control adjustments before actual performance degradation occurs, reducing real-time computational demands

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Productivity

If the system adapts control inputs to compensate for vehicle wear, then the productivity and safety improve, but the difficulty of detecting and measuring wear conditions increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational efficiencyVSAvoidwear detection difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses intermediary indicators such as deviations in actual versus expected vehicle state, abnormal sensor readings, and performance metrics that indirectly reveal wear conditions, making it easier to detect and measure wear without requiring direct sensors for each component

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces direct mechanical wear sensors with data-driven detection methods that use patterns in vehicle operation data, control input effectiveness, and state measurements to infer wear conditions through machine learning and statistical analysis

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS10474157B2Data-based control error detection and parameter compensation system
Publication Date: 2019.11.12 BAIDU USA LLC
  • US10474157B2 patent drawing
  • US10474157B2 patent drawing
  • US10474157B2 patent drawing

AI summary

State of an autonomous driving vehicle (ADV) is measured and stored for a location and speed of the ADV. Later, the state of the ADV is measured for the location and speed corresponding to a previously stored state of the ADV at the same location and speed. Fields of the measured stored states of the ADV are compared. If one or more differences between the measured and stored ADV states exceeds a threshold, then one or more control input parameters of the ADV is adjusted, such as steering, braking, or throttle. Differences may be attributable to road conditions or to state of servicing of the ADV. Differences between measured and stored states of the ADV can be passed to a service module. Service module can access crowd sourced data to determine whether one or more control input parameters for a driving state of one or more ADVs should be updated.