Autonomous Vehicle Disaster Detection and Response

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing systems lack effective methods for autonomous vehicles to detect and respond to disasters, such as earthquakes, in real-time, which can exacerbate safety concerns for passengers and others in the disaster zone.

Innovation Solution

Autonomous vehicles equipped with sensors and machine learning algorithms detect disasters through sensor data, verify the detection, and alter their operation modes based on the type and state of the disaster, communicating with remote computing devices or other vehicles to coordinate responses.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If autonomous vehicles operate without disaster detection capabilities, then device complexity is reduced, but safety and reliability deteriorate due to inability to respond to disasters

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The sensor system originally designed for autonomous navigation is extended to perform dual functions: standard navigation tasks and disaster detection. The same sensors (cameras, LIDAR, accelerometers) serve both purposes, eliminating the need for separate dedicated disaster detection hardware while improving safety

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The vehicle's existing sensor suite and processing systems are leveraged to perform disaster detection autonomously without requiring external monitoring infrastructure. The vehicle self-monitors its operational environment using its own sensors and makes independent safety decisions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Loss of time

If real-time disaster detection is implemented, then response time is improved, but processing time and computational load increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse timeVSAvoidprocessing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Disaster detection algorithms and response protocols are pre-configured and trained during system initialization. The system pre-loads disaster patterns and response strategies, enabling rapid real-time detection and decision-making without extensive computational processing during actual disaster events

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors sensor data and provides real-time feedback to adjust vehicle operation. This closed-loop feedback mechanism enables rapid response to detected disasters by automatically adjusting navigation parameters based on current environmental conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If multiple vehicles coordinate their responses to disasters, then overall safety and reliability improve, but communication and coordination complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoverall safetyVSAvoidcoordination complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple autonomous vehicles merge their sensor data and operational status information to create a collective awareness of disaster conditions. By combining individual vehicle perspectives, the system achieves comprehensive situational understanding and coordinated response without requiring complex centralized control infrastructure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS10807591B1Vehicle disaster detection and response
Publication Date: 2020.10.20 ZOOX INC
  • US10807591B1 patent drawing
  • US10807591B1 patent drawing
  • US10807591B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and processes for controlling a autonomous vehicle when the autonomous vehicle detects a disaster may include receiving a sensor signal from a sensor of a autonomous vehicle and determining that the sensor signal corresponds to a disaster definition accessible to the autonomous vehicle. The systems and processes may further include receiving a corroboration of the detected disaster and altering a drive mode of the autonomous vehicle or receiving an indication that the detected disaster was a false positive and returning to a nominal drive mode of the autonomous vehicle.