Autonomous Driving Controller for Obstacle Avoidance Handover

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

When a driver operates the accelerator or brakes during autonomous driving, steering control may be delayed if the driver's hand is not on the steering wheel, leading to uncontrolled vehicle steering and potential obstacle avoidance failures.

Innovation Solution

A controller that determines driver speed and steering operations during obstacle avoidance and switches from automatic to manual control for speed when necessary, while maintaining automatic steering control.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If automatic control switches to manual control when driver operates accelerator or brakes during obstacle avoidance, then driver can control speed, but steering control becomes uncontrolled and obstacles cannot be avoided

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriver speed controlVSAvoidobstacle avoidance capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The control system is segmented into independent steering control and speed control channels. During obstacle avoidance, the steering control remains in automatic mode while speed control can switch to manual mode, allowing each function to operate independently in its optimal control mode.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The control mode switching is made dynamic and selective rather than uniform. The system dynamically determines which control function (steering or speed) should switch based on the specific operational context, allowing the steering to remain automatic during obstacle avoidance while permitting manual speed control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Extent of automation

If driver's hand is not on steering wheel during automatic obstacle avoidance, then autonomous driving is maintained, but steering operation is delayed when driver needs to control

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautonomous steering controlVSAvoidsteering operation delay
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary assessment of driver intent and operational context before switching control modes. By detecting accelerator or brake operations in advance during obstacle avoidance, the system prepares for potential manual intervention while maintaining automatic steering control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The control system changes operational parameters selectively - maintaining automatic steering control parameters while allowing manual speed control parameters to take effect. This parameter differentiation allows the system to respond to driver input without losing steering control during critical obstacle avoidance maneuvers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS12565241B2Controller
Publication Date: 2026.03.03 ISUZU MOTORS LTD
  • US12565241B2 patent drawing
  • US12565241B2 patent drawing
  • US12565241B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A controller that switches between (i) autonomous driving control for causing a vehicle to travel by automatically controlling the steering and speed of the vehicle and (ii) manual driving control in which the steering and speed are controlled by a driver's operation, the controller includes: a determination part that determines whether a speed control operation for controlling the speed has been performed by the driver while an obstacle preventing the vehicle from traveling is being avoided under the autonomous driving control; and a control switching part that switches the automatic control of the speed included in the autonomous driving control to the manual control and continues the automatic control of the steering when it is determined that the speed control operation has been performed.