Autonomous Racing Overtaking Orchestration With Decision Zones

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current AI systems in autonomous racing vehicles struggle to safely manage overtaking maneuvers, particularly in high-speed environments, due to challenges in complying with safety constraints such as collision avoidance, speed control, and stability.

Innovation Solution

An orchestration platform that divides a racing course into decision and execution zones, using a control unit to analyze and approve proposed overtaking trajectories from autonomous vehicles, ensuring they meet safety and performance criteria.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If current AI hardware and software are used for autonomous overtaking, then the system can process basic driving decisions, but it cannot comply in a timely manner with safety constraints such as collision avoidance, speed control, and stability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety constraint complianceVSAvoidresponse time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The overtaking process is segmented into distinct phases: decision-making zone (where the trailing vehicle proposes overtaking) and execution zone (where the maneuver is completed). This segmentation allows the AI system to focus computational resources on specific safety-critical decisions at each phase rather than processing all possibilities continuously, thereby improving reliability without excessive time loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary safety assessments and trajectory validations in the decision-making zone before the actual overtaking execution. By pre-evaluating potential overtaking paths and checking them against safety constraints in advance, the system ensures compliance with collision avoidance and speed control requirements while maintaining timely response during the actual maneuver.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If defensive maneuvers are increased to block overtaking, then the leading vehicle can maintain position, but the risk of collision increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveposition maintenanceVSAvoidcollision risk
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The leading vehicle receives preliminary information about the trailing vehicle's intended overtaking maneuver in the decision-making zone. This allows the leading vehicle to plan its defensive actions in advance, choosing from predefined safe counter-trajectories that maintain position while avoiding collision, rather than reacting impulsively during the overtaking execution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary communication layer between vehicles, where trajectory intentions and safety constraints are exchanged and coordinated. This intermediary mechanism allows both vehicles to understand each other's intentions and agree on safe maneuvers, reducing collision risk while maintaining position control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If real-time trajectory analysis is performed for all overtaking scenarios, then safety can be maximized, but computational complexity and processing time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety margin complianceVSAvoidcomputational system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies different levels of analysis complexity to different spatial zones on the track. In the decision-making zone, comprehensive trajectory analysis is performed to evaluate safety. In the execution zone, the system relies on pre-approved trajectories with simpler monitoring. This local differentiation of analysis quality reduces overall computational complexity while maintaining safety margins.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameters of trajectory analysis based on the vehicle's location and situation. In the decision-making zone, full safety constraint validation is performed. Once the maneuver enters the execution zone, the system transitions to a simpler monitoring mode with predefined safety checks, reducing computational complexity while maintaining necessary safety oversight.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20250229782A1Overtaking orchestration system for autonomous racing
Publication Date: 2025.07.17 CONSTRUCTOR AUTONOMOUS AG
  • US20250229782A1 patent drawing
  • US20250229782A1 patent drawing
  • US20250229782A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An orchestration platform manages overtaking by autonomous vehicles by way of dividing a course into decision zones and execution zones. Autonomous vehicles proposed overtaking trajectories in the decision zones, which are evaluated and accepted or rejected by the orchestration platform. The orchestration platform is implemented as a master path coordinator that communicates wireless with the autonomous vehicles or at the vehicle level by acting as an on-board mediator of proposed trajectories. Autonomous vehicles are permitted to execute overtaking trajectories that meet certain predetermined safety requirements.