Autonomous Robot Delivery System for Building Package Management

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current autonomous robot delivery systems for buildings lack efficient package management and delivery coordination, particularly in handling incoming and outgoing packages, scheduling, and navigation within the building.

Innovation Solution

A system comprising a package receiving station with display, input device, and computing device, along with a delivery robot, that interacts to receive, validate, and deliver packages, utilizing encoded containers for secure handling and elevator control for navigation, and a control system for scheduling and coordination.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If a traditional manual package delivery system is used in buildings, then human staff can handle package management and delivery coordination, but the system lacks efficiency and requires significant human labor

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepackage delivery efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The autonomous robot delivery system enables self-service operation where robots automatically navigate building corridors, access elevators, locate delivery destinations, and complete package deliveries without human intervention. The system autonomously manages package intake at receiving stations, coordinates delivery schedules, and handles outgoing packages, eliminating the need for human staff while maintaining high productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The delivery system is segmented into independent functional modules: package receiving stations for intake and outgoing shipments, autonomous delivery robots for transportation, elevator control systems for vertical movement, and centralized coordination software for scheduling. This modular segmentation allows each component to operate independently while contributing to overall system efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Ease of operation

If autonomous robot delivery systems are implemented, then delivery efficiency and coordination improve, but the system complexity increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedelivery coordinationVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The autonomous robots are designed as multi-functional units that can perform package intake, navigate to multiple destinations, access different elevators, handle various package sizes, and communicate with building management systems. This universality reduces the need for specialized equipment for each function, managing complexity through consolidation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

A centralized control system acts as an intermediary between package receiving stations, delivery robots, elevators, and building management. This mediator coordinates schedules, routes robots, manages elevator access, and handles exceptions, simplifying the interaction between complex subsystems through a unified coordination layer

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Productivity

If package receiving stations with manipulation devices are used, then package handling efficiency improves, but the device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepackage intake efficiencyVSAvoidstation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The package receiving station replaces complex mechanical manipulation devices with automated robotic arms and conveyor systems that are controlled by computer vision and sensors. This substitution of mechanical systems with automated control systems improves package intake efficiency while managing complexity through software-based control rather than complex mechanical linkages

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Speed

If delivery robots navigate autonomously within buildings, then delivery speed and accuracy improve, but the navigation system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedelivery speedVSAvoidnavigation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The autonomous navigation system continuously receives feedback from sensors, cameras, and building management systems to adjust robot routes in real-time. The system monitors elevator availability, corridor obstacles, and destination status, dynamically optimizing delivery speed while managing navigation complexity through adaptive control algorithms that respond to changing conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20230017144A1System, method and device for managing an autonomous robot delivery system for a building
Publication Date: 2023.01.19 EARTH ROBOTICS INC
  • US20230017144A1 patent drawing
  • US20230017144A1 patent drawing
  • US20230017144A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for receiving and delivering packages to a building having a package receiving station, a delivery robot and a control system. The package receiving station having a display, an input device, a package receiving area, a robot loading area, at least one package manipulation devices, and a computing device, and the delivery robot capable of interacting with the package receiving station to receive packages to be delivered, such that the package receiving station is capable of receiving a package at the package receiving area, moving it to the robot loading area and loading the package onto the delivery robot and the control system is capable of notifying a recipient of the arrival of the package, coordinating a delivery time, and initiating a package delivery whereby the package is loaded onto the delivery robot and delivered to a location within the building and delivers the package.