Autonomous Vehicle Contingency Control for Driver Non-Response

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

BASt level 3 autonomous vehicles face challenges in handling situations where the automated driving system's sensors are impaired or when the driver fails to respond to requests to switch to manual mode, requiring contingency plans that are responsive to the vehicle's driving situation.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that acquire vehicle data from surrounding secondary vehicles to determine a contingency action, allowing the primary vehicle to autonomously manage situations where the driver fails to accept control, using a combination of vehicle-to-vehicle and vehicle-to-cloud communications to minimize latency and maximize situational awareness.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Extent of automation

If the automated driving system relies on vehicle sensors to sense surroundings, then the system can operate autonomously, but the sensors may be impaired by weather conditions, dirt or faults compromising sensing ability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautonomous driving capabilityVSAvoidsensor reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a remote server as an intermediary that receives sensor data from the autonomous vehicle and surrounding vehicles, processes this data to identify obstacles and assess risks, and sends control commands back to the vehicle. This mediator compensates for sensor impairments by using multiple data sources including other vehicles' sensors to overcome individual sensor failures or impairments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Adaptability or versatility

If the automated driving system requests driver intervention, then control can be transferred to the driver, but the driver may fail to respond due to distraction, sleep or illness

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol transfer capabilityVSAvoiddriver response reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by continuously monitoring driver state and pre-assessing contingency plans before driver failure occurs. When the driver fails to respond to a takeover request, the system has already prepared and can immediately execute pre-determined contingency actions such as safe stopping or maintaining current trajectory based on real-time environmental assessment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback loops where the automated driving system continuously monitors whether the driver has responded to takeover requests. If no response is detected within a predetermined time, the system receives feedback about the driver's non-response and automatically executes contingency plans. The system also receives feedback from the remote server about the vehicle's surroundings to adjust contingency actions appropriately.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If the vehicle stops gradually on quiet roads, then safety is improved, but stopping may be dangerous on motorways

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevehicle safetyVSAvoidcontingency action adaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts contingency actions based on real-time assessment of the driving environment. The remote server receives data about surrounding vehicles, road type, traffic conditions, and obstacle positions, then determines the most appropriate action - whether gradual stopping, immediate stopping, maintaining trajectory, or other maneuvers. This dynamic adaptation ensures safety measures are appropriate for each specific situation rather than applying a fixed response.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Loss of information

If vehicle data is acquired from surrounding secondary vehicles, then situational awareness is improved, but communication latency may increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesituational awarenessVSAvoidcommunication latency
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple data sources by receiving sensor data and vehicle state information from both the autonomous vehicle itself and surrounding secondary vehicles. This combined data is processed by the remote server to create a comprehensive view of the environment, including obstacles and traffic conditions that a single vehicle's sensors might miss. The system combines local sensor data with remote vehicle data to improve overall situational awareness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS11698635B2Control of an autonomous vehicle
Publication Date: 2023.07.11 JAGUAR LAND ROVER LTD
  • US11698635B2 patent drawing
  • US11698635B2 patent drawing
  • US11698635B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of controlling a primary vehicle (18) comprising an automated driving system (20) for driving the primary vehicle autonomously when the primary vehicle is in an autonomous mode, the primary vehicle also being operable manually by a driver when in a manual mode, the method comprising: determining failure of the driver to accept a request to switch the primary vehicle to the manual mode when the vehicle is in the autonomous mode; determining a primary vehicle driving state; acquiring vehicle data for one or more surrounding secondary vehicles (22); determining a contingency action to take with the primary vehicle based on the primary vehicle driving state and the vehicle data for the or each secondary vehicle; and outputting the contingency action to at least one system of the primary vehicle to drive the primary vehicle autonomously in accordance with the determined contingency action.