AVD Optimization Using Hemodynamic Second Derivatives

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for optimizing atrioventricular delay (AVD) in implantable medical devices are cumbersome, requiring extensive echocardiographic assessments and multiple scans, making them time-consuming and costly, and existing automated techniques either require significant hardware resources or prolonged processing times.

Innovation Solution

A method utilizing a hemodynamic sensor to analyze sigmoid-type characteristics of atrioventricular delay, estimating an optimal AVD by evaluating second derivative values at discrete points, allowing for rapid and automated optimization without extensive scanning or high-power hardware requirements.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If echocardiographic assessment is used to optimize AVD, then measurement precision is improved, but loss of time and device complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveAVD optimization accuracyVSAvoidoptimization time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical echocardiographic assessment system with an automated electronic system using hemodynamic sensors and signal processing algorithms. The device uses intracardiac pressure sensors to detect ventricular filling waves and automatically computes optimal AVD through digital signal analysis, eliminating the need for external echocardiography equipment and reducing optimization time from minutes to seconds.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent enables the implantable device to autonomously optimize its own AVD parameter using built-in hemodynamic sensors and processing capabilities. The device automatically detects filling waves, analyzes the hemodynamic response to different AVD values, and self-adjusts the optimal delay without requiring external hospital equipment or specialist intervention, making the optimization process self-contained and immediate.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Measurement precision

If multiple scans are performed to optimize AVD, then measurement precision is improved, but loss of time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveAVD optimization accuracyVSAvoidoptimization speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary assessment of hemodynamic response by analyzing the first few beats after parameter changes. The system uses the initial ventricular filling wave detections to quickly estimate the direction of optimal AVD adjustment, then makes immediate corrections without waiting for extended scanning periods. This preliminary action approach reduces the number of scans needed while maintaining optimization accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent accelerates the optimization process by skipping unnecessary intermediate scanning steps. Instead of performing multiple sequential scans with long intervals, the system rapidly sequences through AVD adjustments using continuous hemodynamic monitoring, rushing through the optimization process in a single integrated measurement cycle rather than multiple separate scans.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #21Skipping (Rushing through)

3Ease of operation

If automated optimization is implemented, then ease of operation is improved, but use of energy increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomation levelVSAvoiddevice power consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements periodic optimization rather than continuous scanning. The automated system activates hemodynamic sensing and AVD adjustment only at predetermined intervals or when triggered by specific physiological conditions, allowing the device to enter low-power states between optimization cycles. This periodic operation maintains ease of use while significantly reducing average power consumption compared to continuous monitoring.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial automation by selecting only the most critical hemodynamic parameters for analysis rather than processing all available sensor data. The system focuses computational resources on detecting the primary ventricular filling wave and computing the dominant frequency component, performing sufficient but not excessive analysis to achieve optimization while conserving energy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

4Measurement precision

If extensive scanning is performed to optimize AVD, then measurement precision is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveAVD optimization accuracyVSAvoidhardware requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the essential hemodynamic information needed for AVD optimization from the complex sensor data stream. The system selectively detects ventricular filling waves and computes the dominant frequency component, discarding extraneous signals and details. This extraction approach achieves precise optimization using minimal processing complexity and simple sensor requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent optimizes AVD by monitoring changes in a single key parameter - the dominant frequency component of ventricular filling waves - rather than analyzing multiple complex parameters simultaneously. By focusing on this one critical parameter that directly reflects hemodynamic response to AVD changes, the system achieves accurate optimization with minimal computational complexity and simple hardware implementation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS9205267B2Apparatus and method for automatic optimization of atrioventricular delay for an active medical device
Publication Date: 2015.12.08 SORIN CRM
  • US9205267B2 patent drawing
  • US9205267B2 patent drawing
  • US9205267B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for use by an active medical device includes using a stimulation device and an endocardial acceleration sensor to obtain a plurality of hemodynamic parameters associated with at least three atrioventricular delays. The method further includes using the plurality of hemodynamic parameters to find a second derivative associated with the atrioventricular delays. The method further includes using interpolation to estimate an atrioventricular delay which will reduce the second derivative associated with the atrioventricular delays. The method further includes using the estimated atrioventricular delay in a subsequent stimulation.