Axial Electron Impact Ion Source With Separate Ionization Regions

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional electron impact ion sources face challenges with ion extraction efficiency and contamination of electrodes, leading to reduced sensitivity and increased maintenance needs, particularly when using calibrants like perfluorokerosene or perfluorotributylamine, which result in decreased signal intensity over time.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of an axial electron impact ion source with separate ionization regions allows for independent control of each region's conditions, including pressure and electron beam alignment, minimizing contamination and enhancing ionization efficiency by directing molecules away from electrodes and operating under high vacuum conditions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If traditional crossed-beam ion source is used, then ion extraction efficiency is low, but device structure is simple

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveion extraction efficiencyVSAvoiddevice structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The ion source is divided into separate functional regions: a first ionization region for sample molecules and a second ionization region for calibrant molecules. This segmentation allows independent optimization of each region, improving ion extraction efficiency while maintaining manageable structural complexity through modular design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from a crossed-beam geometry to an axial geometry where the electron beam and ion beam share a common axis. This dimensional reorganization improves ion extraction efficiency by aligning the extraction field with the ion generation region, while the axial configuration actually simplifies certain structural elements compared to the crossed-beam design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Productivity

If axial ion source is used to improve ion extraction efficiency, then electrode contamination increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveion extraction efficiencyVSAvoidelectrode contamination
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

By separating the ionization into distinct first and second regions, the patent prevents contamination from calibrant molecules (introduced in the second region) from reaching the extraction electrodes. The spatial segmentation creates a physical barrier that maintains electrode cleanliness while preserving high ion extraction efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts the calibrant molecule introduction point from the main ionization path by placing it in a separate second ionization region. This extraction of the calibrant introduction function prevents calibrant molecules from contaminating the extraction electrodes while still allowing effective ionization of both sample and calibrant molecules.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Productivity

If separate ionization regions are implemented, then ionization efficiency is enhanced, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveionization efficiencyVSAvoiddevice structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The electron beam serves multiple functions: it ionizes sample molecules in the first ionization region and calibrant molecules in the second ionization region. This multi-functionality of the electron beam system enhances overall ionization efficiency without proportionally increasing device complexity, as the same electron source and control systems serve both regions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent combines the electron beam generation and control systems to serve both ionization regions, merging functions that could have been separate. This consolidation enhances ionization efficiency for both sample and calibrant molecules while limiting the increase in device complexity through shared components and integrated control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Object-affected harmful factors

If electrodes are cleaned regularly by removing the body, then contamination is reduced, but sample throughput decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectrode contaminationVSAvoidsample throughput
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the source of contamination (calibrant molecules) from the path to the extraction electrodes by introducing them in a separate second ionization region. This prevents contamination in the first place, eliminating the need for regular cleaning interruptions and maintaining continuous sample throughput while keeping electrodes clean.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The design preliminarily prevents electrode contamination by spatially separating the calibrant introduction region from the electrode area. This preliminary protective action eliminates the need for subsequent cleaning operations, maintaining both low contamination levels and continuous high sample throughput without operational interruptions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration improves ion extraction efficiency, maintains long-term stability and sensitivity, reduces electrode contamination, and increases sample throughput, enabling more robust and cost-effective analytical performance.

Implementation Method 1

electrons are typically emitted from a heated filament and are accelerated into an ionisation volume containing sample gas molecules. Sample gas molecules are ionized by electron impact

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectron impact ionisation: Ionisation

Implementation Method 2

electrons are typically emitted from a heated filament

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermionic emission: Thermionic Emission

Implementation Method 3

one or more permanent magnets are employed to focus and guide the ionizing electron beam through the ionisation volume

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic field: Magnetic Field

Implementation Method 4

A positive voltage is applied between pusher electrode P and extraction electrode E that accelerates and focuses generated ions through a slit in the extraction electrode E

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectric field: Electric Field

Data Source

PatentUS20240420943A1Axial ion source
Publication Date: 2024.12.19 THERMO FISHER SCI BREMEN
  • US20240420943A1 patent drawing
  • US20240420943A1 patent drawing
  • US20240420943A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An electron impact ion source comprises: a first ionisation region comprising an aperture configured to receive first molecules into the first ionisation region, the first ionisation region being configured to receive an electron beam along a first axis to generate a first ion beam along the first axis from the first molecules; and a second, separate ionisation region comprising an inlet configured to receive second molecules into the second ionisation region, the second ionisation region configured to receive the electron beam along the first axis to generate a second ion beam along the first axis from the second molecules.