Baby walker apparatus and method of controlling the same

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Baby walkers pose a risk of injury to children due to their potential to tip over, travel to dangerous locations, and lack of parental control over the child's movement, leading to accidents in areas like stairs, swimming pools, and kitchens.

Innovation Solution

A baby walker equipped with sensors (proximity, position, and weight sensors) and a controller that applies brakes to prevent accidents by detecting objects, terrain, and predefined regions, using communication modules to receive and transmit safety coordinates, ensuring the child remains within safe areas.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a baby walker is designed to be simple and easy to operate, then the ease of operation is improved, but the safety control capability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of operationVSAvoidsafety control capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The baby walker is equipped with autonomous safety features including proximity sensors, position sensors, and weight sensors that automatically detect hazards and control the braking system without requiring parental intervention. The controller autonomously processes sensor data and activates brakes when safety thresholds are exceeded, enabling the device to protect the child independently while maintaining simple operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Traditional mechanical control systems are replaced with electronic sensing and control mechanisms. Proximity sensors use electromagnetic fields to detect objects, position sensors track location, and weight sensors monitor child presence, all processed by an electronic controller that replaces manual mechanical braking control with automated electronic actuation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Adaptability or versatility

If a baby walker allows the child to move freely in all directions, then the mobility is improved, but the risk of traveling to dangerous locations increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovemobilityVSAvoidrisk of traveling to dangerous locations
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The baby walker incorporates continuous feedback through position sensors that monitor the device's location and proximity sensors that detect nearby hazards. The controller receives real-time data about the walker's position and surrounding environment, comparing it against safe operation parameters, and automatically activates braking control when potential dangers are detected, thereby managing mobility within safety boundaries.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The safety system performs preliminary detection and assessment before the child can reach dangerous locations. Position sensors continuously track the walker's location, and proximity sensors scan for hazards in advance, allowing the controller to preemptively activate brakes before the child encounters harmful situations such as stairs, pools, or kitchens.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If parental monitoring and control features are added to the baby walker, then the safety control capability is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety control capabilityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The controller serves multiple functions simultaneously: it processes data from proximity sensors, position sensors, and weight sensors; determines safe and dangerous regions; controls the braking system; and provides parental notifications. This multi-functional integration allows comprehensive safety monitoring and control without proportionally increasing device complexity, as a single controller unit handles all safety-critical operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

Multiple sensing functions (proximity detection, position tracking, weight monitoring) are merged into a unified safety control system. The controller integrates data from all sensors and coordinates the braking system in a single centralized architecture, reducing overall system complexity compared to having separate control mechanisms for each safety function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Reliability

If the baby walker is equipped with multiple sensors and control mechanisms, then the safety control capability is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety control capabilityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The safety system is segmented into distinct functional modules: proximity sensors for hazard detection, position sensors for location tracking, weight sensors for child presence verification, and a centralized controller that processes all inputs. This modular segmentation allows each sensor type to be optimized independently while the controller integrates their functions, managing complexity through structured organization of multiple safety components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution effectively reduces the risk of accidents by automatically slowing or stopping the baby walker when it approaches hazards or leaves designated safe zones, enhancing parental control and safety.

Implementation Method 1

a proximity sensor operative to detect an object and generate a proximity signal

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectProximity detection:

Implementation Method 2

a position sensor operative to detect a position of the baby walker and generate a position signal

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPosition detection:

Implementation Method 3

a weight sensor operative to detect a weight of a baby and generate a weight signal

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectWeight detection:

Implementation Method 4

the braking system is a solenoid actuator operative to receive the brake signal and actuate a rod into one of the plurality of holes to stop the baby walker

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSolenoid actuation: Solenoid

Implementation Method 5

the braking system is an electrical motor having a shaft rotatably coupled with the wheel and wherein the motor is operative to receive the brake signal and apply a torque on the shaft to substantially slow the baby walker

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic torque:

Data Source

PatentUS10791847B2Baby walker apparatus and method of controlling the same
Publication Date: 2020.10.06 BAHARMAND MOHAMMAD
  • US10791847B2 patent drawing
  • US10791847B2 patent drawing
  • US10791847B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A baby walker comprises sensors and control mechanisms to detect dangerous situations and to stop or substantially slow the baby walker. The baby walker uses proximity sensors, position sensors, presence sensors, and/or communication modules in order to assess the environment for the safety of the child. It also includes a controller that can apply a brake to the wheel assembly to stop or substantially slow the baby walker so as to protect the baby from entering dangerous regions or come in close proximity to objects. The baby walker may further receive and/or transmit information from an external device which may be operated by the child's guardian to define the borders of dangerous regions or a predefined travel distance.