Backside Resistor Structure for Precision IC Routing Relief

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

As IC devices miniaturize, the available area for forming contacts and interconnects decreases, leading to increased routing complexity, parasitic resistance, and capacitance, which negatively impact manufacturing costs and performance.

Innovation Solution

Implementing high-precision backside resistors by fabricating them between frontside and backside metal layers, utilizing backside contacts and vias to connect to frontside structures, allowing for no change to the existing frontside BEOL process and freeing up frontside routing resources.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Power

If IC devices are miniaturized to advance computing power, then computing power increases, but routing complexity and parasitic resistance increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputing powerVSAvoidrouting complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent moves the resistor implementation from the traditional frontside interconnect layer to the backside of the substrate. This dimensional relocation allows resistors to be formed in a previously underutilized space, separating them from the dense frontside routing and reducing routing complexity without impacting computing power.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent divides the substrate into frontside and backside regions with distinct functions. The frontside handles active components and interconnects, while the backside is dedicated to passive components like resistors. This segmentation reduces the complexity of frontside routing by relocating resistor implementations to the backside.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Length of moving object

If IC devices are miniaturized, then device size decreases, but parasitic resistance increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice sizeVSAvoidparasitic resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
Length of moving objectVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

By relocating resistors to the backside of the substrate, the patent creates longer, more controlled resistor paths that are physically separated from the frontside interconnects. This dimensional separation reduces the parasitic resistance impact on frontside signaling while maintaining compact device dimensions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The substrate itself acts as an intermediary medium, with resistors formed in the backside region serving as mediators between the frontside circuits and the ground plane. This intermediary positioning allows for better control of parasitic effects while maintaining signal integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Adaptability or versatility

If more contacts and interconnects are formed on the frontside, then connectivity increases, but available area decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveconnectivityVSAvoidavailable area
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent utilizes the backside of the substrate as an additional dimensional space for implementing passive components. This allows frontside area to be fully dedicated to active components and interconnects, maximizing connectivity without sacrificing available area, as resistors are now formed in the backside region.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the substrate into frontside and backside functional regions. The frontside is optimized for high-density interconnects and active components, while the backside accommodates passive components like resistors. This segmentation enables maximum connectivity on the frontside without compromising available area.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Ease of manufacture

If frontside routing resources are used for resistors, then resistor implementation is simple, but routing resources are consumed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresistor implementation simplicityVSAvoidrouting resource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent relocates resistor formation to the backside of the substrate, utilizing the previously underutilized backside region. This dimensional relocation maintains the simplicity of resistor implementation through standard thin-film deposition processes while freeing up frontside routing resources for signal interconnects.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts the resistor implementation from the frontside routing layer and places it in the backside region. This extraction eliminates the conflict between resistor area requirements and routing resource availability, as resistors are now formed in a separate spatial domain without consuming frontside routing resources.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS20250336811A1High-precision backside resistor
Publication Date: 2025.10.30 QUALCOMM INC
  • US20250336811A1 patent drawing
  • US20250336811A1 patent drawing
  • US20250336811A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A high-precision backside resistor and method for making the same are disclosed. In an aspect, a backside resistor structure disposed between a frontside level-zero metal (FM0) layer and a backside level-zero metal (BM0) layer comprises a first terminal electrically coupled to a first frontside structure through a first conductive path comprising at least a first backside contact (BSC), and a second terminal electrically coupled to a second frontside structure through a second conductive path comprising at least a second BSC.