Electric Battery Charging Control via Periodic Intervals

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current electric vehicle battery recharging methods do not optimally account for constraints related to the electrical network, the battery itself, and user schedules, leading to inefficient energy use and potential damage to recharging devices.

Innovation Solution

An optimized recharging method that determines charging time intervals based on the electrical network's load curve, the battery's state of charge, and user availability, using a computer program to manage charging to minimize stress on the network and extend battery life.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of time

If recharging starts immediately when connected to the electrical network, then charging time is reduced, but transformer stress and heating increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecharging timeVSAvoidtransformer stress and heating
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The charging process is divided into periodic intervals with alternating charging and pause phases. The controller monitors transformer temperature and load, activating charging only during safe periods when transformer stress is within acceptable limits, thus preventing continuous overheating while still achieving reasonable charging speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

Before initiating charging, the controller performs a preliminary assessment of transformer load and temperature conditions. This preliminary action determines whether immediate charging is safe or if a pause is required first, preventing harmful transformer stress before it occurs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Ease of operation

If charging continues until the battery is full or user disconnects, then user convenience is maintained, but energy efficiency is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser convenienceVSAvoidenergy efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The controller continuously monitors battery state of charge, transformer conditions, and user-defined parameters. Based on this feedback, the controller dynamically adjusts charging activation/deactivation timing to optimize energy efficiency while respecting user convenience requirements and battery charge levels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes operational parameters (charging power, activation timing) based on real-time conditions. When transformer stress is high or battery is nearly full, the controller modifies charging parameters to reduce energy waste while maintaining user convenience through flexible disconnection options.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If charging is performed during high-load periods, then user schedule flexibility is maintained, but transformer aging accelerates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser schedule flexibilityVSAvoidtransformer lifespan
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDuration of action of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements periodic charging intervals that avoid continuous operation during high-load periods. By alternating between charging activation and pause phases based on transformer load monitoring, the system reduces cumulative transformer stress and heating while still providing charging service during user-available periods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The controller performs preliminary monitoring of transformer load conditions before activating charging. This preliminary assessment prevents charging initiation during periods that would excessively accelerate transformer aging, thereby extending transformer lifespan while maintaining user schedule flexibility through alternative charging timing options.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentEP2753491B1Method and device for the optimized recharging of an electric battery
Publication Date: 2015.10.14 ELECTRICITE DE FRANCE
  • EP2753491B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2753491B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2753491B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The invention relates to a method for the optimized recharging of the electric battery (BAT) of at least one electric system (VE), particularly an electric vehicle, using an electric recharging device (TE), in which the electric battery (BAT) is recharged (400) during at least one charging time interval (∆Tchg(i)) which is part of an available charging time period (Td) initiated by connection of the electric battery recharging system to the electric recharging device and which is determined (300) as a function of a charging curve (TLC) associated with this electric recharging device. The invention also relates to an optimized recharging device (TE) employing such a method and to an optimized recharging system (SE) comprising such an optimized recharging device.