Battery Compartment Locking Controller for Safety Hazards

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Portable electrical energy storage devices in vehicles, such as scooters and motorbikes, face issues with safety due to potential overheating, explosions, or other catastrophic failures, which can lead to unsafe conditions, and existing systems lack effective mechanisms to automatically lock compartments to prevent user access during such events.

Innovation Solution

A portable electrical energy storage device compartment locking system that includes a locking mechanism controller, coupled with safety sensors, which detects unsafe conditions and automatically locks the compartment to prevent access, while also communicating with the vehicle's electronic control unit to reduce power draw and alert external devices.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the compartment is automatically locked during unsafe conditions, then user safety is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser safetyVSAvoidlocking system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The locking mechanism controller is integrated with the vehicle's existing electronic control unit, combining safety monitoring and locking functions into a unified control system. This reduces overall system complexity while maintaining the automatic locking capability during unsafe conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The locking mechanism controller serves multiple functions: it monitors unsafe conditions through sensors, automatically locks the compartment when hazards are detected, communicates with external devices, and coordinates with the vehicle's power management system. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate dedicated systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If safety sensors and locking mechanisms are added, then protection against unsafe conditions is improved, but manufacturing cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotection against unsafe conditionsVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The electronic control unit is designed to handle multiple tasks including safety monitoring, locking control, and external communication, reducing the need for separate dedicated components and lowering overall manufacturing costs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system automatically detects unsafe conditions through integrated sensors and triggers the locking mechanism without requiring external intervention or complex control systems, simplifying the overall architecture and reducing manufacturing expenses.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Reliability

If the system automatically locks the compartment during unsafe conditions, then containment of hazards is improved, but ease of operation deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontainment of hazardsVSAvoidcompartment accessibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The locking mechanism is dynamically controlled based on real-time safety conditions. The compartment remains easily accessible during normal operation but automatically locks when unsafe conditions are detected, providing adaptive accessibility that prioritizes both ease of operation and hazard containment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors unsafe conditions through sensors and provides feedback to the locking mechanism controller. This feedback loop ensures the compartment is locked only when necessary, maintaining ease of operation during safe conditions while ensuring containment when hazards are present.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentEP3065970B1Apparatus, method and article for power storage device failure safety
Publication Date: 2020.07.01 GOGORO
  • EP3065970B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3065970B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3065970B1 patent drawingFigure 3A

AI summary

In response to receiving information regarding an unsafe condition from portable electrical energy storage device (e.g., battery) safety sensors, a locking mechanism controller determines whether the battery is in a desired state to, as a safety measure, have the compartment that holds the battery locked and/or to send a signal to reduce or eliminate current draw from the battery. If the locking mechanism controller determines the battery is in the desired state to have the compartment locked, then it sends a signal to a compartment locking mechanism causing the compartment locking mechanism to lock the compartment in which the battery is located to prevent a user from opening the compartment, and thus helps protect the user against the unsafe condition. In some embodiments, the unsafe condition may be a potential or existing catastrophic failure of the battery in the compartment (e.g., a meltdown, explosion or dangerous leak, etc.).