Distributed Battery State Estimation for Real-Time Accuracy

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current battery management systems face challenges in accurately estimating battery states, particularly in real-time, especially on compute-limited resources, and in validating models to ensure precision, while also optimizing the useful lifetime and economic value of battery systems.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that includes a computing system with a state estimator, simulation engine, and model generator, which distributes computation between remote and local systems to enhance battery state estimation, uses modular models to select and validate battery models based on application-specific criteria, and enables real-time monitoring and prediction of battery performance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If battery state estimation is performed in real-time on compute-limited resources, then responsiveness and operational utility are improved, but measurement precision and accuracy deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereal-time processing speedVSAvoidbattery state estimation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides battery state estimation into two segments: a computationally intensive model validation and selection process performed offline, and a simplified real-time estimation process executed on compute-limited resources during operation. This segmentation allows complex computations to be done when computational resources are available, while real-time operations use pre-computed models that run efficiently on constrained devices.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary model validation, selection, and optimization before real-time battery operation. During these preliminary phases, multiple candidate models are evaluated and validated against historical data to identify the optimal model for real-time deployment. This preliminary action ensures that the model selected for real-time execution is already optimized for both accuracy and computational efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Measurement precision

If complex validation and model selection processes are implemented, then battery state estimation accuracy is improved, but device complexity and computational requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebattery state estimation accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The validation and model selection process is segmented into distinct phases: data collection, model training, validation against multiple criteria, and deployment. Each phase produces intermediate results that can be independently evaluated and stored. This segmentation reduces the apparent complexity by breaking down the monolithic validation process into manageable, modular stages that can be executed sequentially.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates simplified copies of complex validation results in the form of pre-computed model parameters, lookup tables, and optimized algorithms. These copies encapsulate the outcomes of extensive validation processes in a form that is computationally efficient for real-time execution, thereby reducing the complexity burden during operational phases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Reliability

If extensive model validation is performed to ensure threshold accuracy, then reliability is improved, but loss of time and computational resources increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel validation reliabilityVSAvoidvalidation time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Model validation is performed as a preliminary action before real-time battery operation begins. During this offline phase, candidate models are validated against historical battery data using multiple validation criteria including accuracy metrics, computational efficiency, and robustness tests. The validation results are cached and reused, eliminating the need for repeated validation during real-time operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The validation process evaluates multiple model parameters and thresholds to identify the optimal configuration for real-time execution. By adjusting validation parameters such as accuracy thresholds, confidence levels, and computational constraints, the system balances the depth of validation against the time investment required, ensuring sufficient reliability without excessive computational overhead.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS11988722B2Battery analysis system and method
Publication Date: 2024.05.21 FORTESCUE ZERO LTD
  • US11988722B2 patent drawing
  • US11988722B2 patent drawing
  • US11988722B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system or method for determining a battery state can include receiving a set of sensor measurements; determining the battery state using a state estimator collocated with the battery; and determining parameters used by the state estimator using a second state estimator operating on a processor remote from the battery.