Battery Station Usage Prediction for Supply-Demand Balancing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing battery management systems lack efficient methods to balance supply and demand of batteries across multiple stations, leading to potential shortages and inefficiencies in battery lending and charging processes, particularly for electric vehicles.

Innovation Solution

A battery management system that includes a management server and battery stations connected via a communication network, allowing for real-time monitoring and prediction of supply and demand, enabling users to reserve batteries and adjust usage patterns to balance demand across stations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If multiple battery stations are arranged in an area to increase availability, then the convenience for users is improved, but the complexity of managing supply and demand across stations increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser convenienceVSAvoidsystem management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The management server implements a feedback mechanism by continuously monitoring battery usage data from multiple stations, predicting future demand patterns, and automatically adjusting supply distribution. This closed-loop system resolves the contradiction by automating the management complexity while maintaining high user convenience across multiple stations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically changes operational parameters such as battery allocation, charging schedules, and station inventory levels based on predicted demand. By adjusting these parameters automatically, the system manages the complexity of multiple stations while preserving user convenience through optimized battery availability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If real-time monitoring and prediction systems are implemented to balance supply and demand, then the efficiency of battery lending and charging is improved, but the device complexity and computational requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebattery lending efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The management server performs self-service by automatically analyzing usage patterns, predicting demand, and making allocation decisions without manual intervention. This automation improves lending efficiency while containing complexity within the server's computational processes rather than requiring complex hardware infrastructure at each station.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary actions by predicting future battery demand and pre-positioning batteries at stations where they will be needed. This advance planning improves lending efficiency by ensuring battery availability while managing complexity through centralized computational prediction rather than distributed decision-making.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If batteries are strategically positioned and user behavior is adjusted to balance demand, then the likelihood of shortages is reduced, but the loss of time for data collection and analysis increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebattery availability reliabilityVSAvoiddata processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements continuous monitoring and real-time data processing, eliminating gaps in data collection. This continuous operation maintains high battery availability reliability by constantly adjusting to demand changes while minimizing total processing time through uninterrupted analysis rather than periodic batch processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses periodic demand prediction cycles that analyze accumulated data at optimized intervals. This periodic approach balances reliability by frequently enough updating battery positions while minimizing time loss through efficient, scheduled analysis rather than continuous heavy computation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Data Source

PatentUS12174678B2Information processing device, computer-readable storage medium, and information processing method
Publication Date: 2024.12.24 HONDA MOTOR CO LTD
  • US12174678B2 patent drawing
  • US12174678B2 patent drawing
  • US12174678B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An information processing device comprises a prediction unit configured to predict a first user who uses a storage apparatus that stores a power storage device in a first time period subsequent to a current time point. The prediction unit may predict the first user based on usage information that indicates usage history of a second user who used storage apparatus in a second time period prior to the first time period. The usage information may include information related to a time frame when the second user used the storage apparatus in the second time period. The prediction unit may predict that at least some of the second users who used, in the second time period, the storage apparatus during a time frame to which the first time period belongs use the storage apparatus in the first time period.