Battery System Upper-Limit Electrical Quantity Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional battery systems fail to effectively prevent the deterioration of secondary batteries, leading to increased weight and cost due to excessive battery capacity, and may not ensure a sufficient electrical quantity for a predetermined period, resulting in reduced travelable distance in battery-equipped vehicles.

Innovation Solution

A battery system with an upper-limit electrical quantity setting means that sets a limit below the full charge state, gradually decreasing as the battery deteriorates, and a charging means that charges the battery up to this limit, ensuring a stable and sufficient electrical quantity over time.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If the battery is charged to full charge state in every charging, then the electrical quantity obtainable from the battery is maximized, but the deterioration of the battery accelerates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectrical quantityVSAvoidbattery deterioration
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by charging the battery only to an upper-limit electrical quantity that is less than the full charge state. The upper-limit electrical quantity is set to a value that provides a predetermined margin (e.g., 80-90% of full charge) to prevent excessive charging that causes rapid deterioration. This partial charging approach balances electrical quantity availability with battery life extension.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements dynamics by making the upper-limit electrical quantity adjustable based on the deterioration state of the battery. As the battery deteriorates over time, the upper-limit electrical quantity is dynamically revised to an even lower value. This dynamic adjustment ensures that the battery is never charged to a level that would cause rapid deterioration, while still maximizing the usable electrical quantity at each stage of the battery's life.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If the initial battery capacity is increased to account for deterioration, then the warranted electrical quantity can be maintained, but the vehicle weight and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewarranted electrical quantityVSAvoidvehicle weight
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by proactively managing the upper-limit electrical quantity based on predicted future deterioration. Instead of increasing initial battery capacity to compensate for future losses, the system pre-establishes a charging strategy that prevents rapid deterioration from the outset. By charging to a lower upper-limit electrical quantity from the beginning and adjusting it dynamically as deterioration progresses, the system maintains the warranted electrical quantity without requiring excessive initial capacity, thereby avoiding increased vehicle weight.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Device complexity

If the upper-limit electrical quantity is set to a fixed value, then the charging control is simple, but the electrical quantity may become insufficient as the battery deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecharging control complexityVSAvoidelectrical quantity
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback by continuously monitoring the deterioration state of the battery and using this information to dynamically adjust the upper-limit electrical quantity. The system receives input about the battery's current state (through voltage, current, temperature measurements and historical data) and automatically revises the upper-limit electrical quantity accordingly. This feedback mechanism ensures that the electrical quantity remains sufficient throughout the battery's life without requiring complex manual intervention or fixed conservative limits.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS8531154B2Battery system and battery system-equipped vehicle
Publication Date: 2013.09.10 TOYOTA JIDOSHA KK
  • US8531154B2 patent drawing
  • US8531154B2 patent drawing
  • US8531154B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A battery system 100 includes an upper-limit electrical quantity setting means (an ECU 120) for setting an upper limit of an electrical quantity (an upper-limit electrical quantity Da) obtainable from a battery pack 110 to a lower value than in a full charge state. This upper-limit electrical quantity setting means 120 sets the upper-limit electrical quantity Da to a value having a difference from the electrical quantity (a full-charge electrical quantity Dmax) obtainable from the full charge state so that the difference is smaller as the deterioration of the battery pack 110 progresses. Further, the battery system 100 includes a charging means (the ECU 120) for charging the battery pack 110 under the condition that the upper-limit electrical quantity Da is an upper limit.