Bulk Acoustic Wave Resonator Boundary Mass Structure for Q Stability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional bulk acoustic wave resonators face challenges in enhancing mechanical strength and Q factor while maintaining flatness and suppressing spurious modes, due to the vulnerability of the resonance film to stress and the impact of boundary conditions on acoustic wave reflection.

Innovation Solution

A bulk acoustic wave resonator with a mass adjustment structure comprising a supporting layer, lower and upper metal layers, and a piezoelectric layer, where a mass adjustment structure is formed on the top-inner surface within the acoustic wave resonance region, allowing for adjustment of the boundary conditions to enhance the Q factor and mechanical strength, and prevent collapse.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Volume of moving object

If the resonance film is made thinner to reduce device size, then the device becomes more compact, but the mechanical strength decreases making it prone to bending and collapse

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice sizeVSAvoidmechanical strength of resonance film
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by creating a through-hole at the center of the resonance film rather than uniformly thickening the entire structure. This localized modification provides mechanical support exactly where needed (at the center where bending stress is highest) while keeping the rest of the film thin, thus resolving the contradiction between device compactness and mechanical strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Reliability

If material is removed to form annular recesses to improve Q factor, then the Q factor is enhanced, but the mechanical strength of the resonance film is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveQ factorVSAvoidmechanical strength of resonance film
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of removing material in annular recesses around the periphery, the patent places a through-hole at the center of the resonance film. This localized structural modification achieves the desired acoustic boundary condition improvement for enhancing Q factor while actually strengthening the film by providing central support, thus resolving the contradiction between Q factor enhancement and mechanical strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Reliability

If the resonance film is made thinner to improve acoustic wave propagation, then the acoustic performance is enhanced, but the flatness of the film deteriorates under stress

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveacoustic wave propagationVSAvoidflatness of resonance film
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSShape

Solution Approach 1:

The patent maintains the thin film structure for good acoustic wave propagation but introduces a through-hole at the center where the film is most vulnerable to bending. This localized modification provides mechanical support that maintains flatness under stress while preserving the thin-film acoustic performance, thus resolving the contradiction between acoustic propagation and flatness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Reliability

If a protruding structure is formed on the bottom electrode to improve Q factor, then the Q factor is enhanced, but the entire flatness of the resonance film is affected

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveQ factorVSAvoidentire flatness of resonance film
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSShape

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of forming a protruding structure on the bottom electrode that would affect the entire flatness of the resonance film, the patent creates a through-hole at the center of the film. This localized approach provides the necessary boundary condition modification for Q factor enhancement while minimizing impact on overall flatness, as the modification is confined to a small central region rather than affecting the entire film structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The mass adjustment structure effectively enhances the Q factor and mechanical strength of the resonator, preventing bending and collapse under stress, while maintaining the flatness of the resonance film and suppressing spurious modes.

Implementation Method 1

The piezoelectric layer 92 is formed on the bottom electrode 91. The top electrode 93 is formed on the piezoelectric layer 92. The overlapping of the top electrode 93, the piezoelectric layer 92 and the bottom electrode 91 form a resonance film of the bulk acoustic wave resonator.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPiezoelectric effect: Piezoelectric Effect

Data Source

PatentUS10250228B2Bulk acoustic wave resonator with a mass adjustment structure and its application to bulk acoustic wave filter
Publication Date: 2019.04.02 WIN SEMICON
  • US10250228B2 patent drawing
  • US10250228B2 patent drawing
  • US10250228B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A bulk acoustic wave resonator with a mass adjustment structure comprises a supporting layer, a lower metal layer, a piezoelectric layer, an upper metal layer and a mass adjustment structure. The supporting layer is formed on a substrate. The supporting layer has a cavity, and the cavity has a top-inner surface. The lower metal layer is formed on the supporting layer. The piezoelectric layer is formed on the lower metal layer. The upper metal layer is formed on the piezoelectric layer. An acoustic wave resonance region is defined by an overlapping region of projections of the upper metal layer, the piezoelectric layer, the lower metal layer, the supporting layer and the cavity. The acoustic wave resonance region is divided into a peripheral region and a central region. The mass adjustment structure comprises a peripheral mass adjustment structure formed on the top-inner surface within the peripheral region.