Bee Pollen Substitute Composition for Complete Colony Nutrition

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing pollen substitutes for honeybees are unpalatable, provide inadequate nutrition, contain toxic compounds, and can reduce worker bee lifespan, leading to poor foraging performance and inadequate pollination services, while bumblebee production relies on honeybee-collected pollen, exposing bumblebees to parasites and pathogens.

Innovation Solution

A composition comprising a balanced mixture of macronutrients and micronutrients, including specific ratios of proteins, fatty acids, and carbohydrates, designed to mimic naturally occurring floral pollen, providing complete nutrition without the need for additional floral pollen, and improving bee performance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If pollen substitutes are added to honeybee colonies, then nutrition can be provided during periods when natural pollen is insufficient, but the substitutes are unpalatable and provide inadequate nutrition

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepollen availabilityVSAvoidnutrition quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by precisely controlling the composition ratios of proteins (10-50%), fatty acids (1-30%), and carbohydrates (20-90%) in the pollen substitute. This optimization of chemical parameters ensures the substitute is both palatable to bees and provides complete nutrition, resolving the contradiction between availability and nutrition quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses composite materials by combining multiple protein sources, fatty acid sources, and carbohydrate sources into a unified pollen substitute formulation. This composite approach ensures balanced nutrition while improving palatability, thereby resolving the contradiction between quantity availability and nutrition reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Quantity of substance

If pollen substitutes are used to feed honeybees, then nutrition can be supplied, but the substitutes contain toxic compounds and compounds that bees cannot digest

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepollen substitute availabilityVSAvoidtoxicity and digestibility issues
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies the extraction principle by carefully selecting and combining specific protein sources, fatty acid sources, and carbohydrate sources that are known to be safe and digestible for bees. This selective extraction of beneficial components while excluding toxic substances resolves the contradiction between substitute availability and harm reduction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent converts the potential harm of using synthetic or inappropriate protein sources into benefit by carefully selecting plant-based and bee-friendly protein sources that are both nutritious and safe. This transforms the risk of toxicity into a benefit of using safe, digestible ingredients.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

3Quantity of substance

If high protein concentrations are provided in pollen substitutes, then nutrition can be enhanced, but worker bee lifespan is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotein concentrationVSAvoidworker bee lifespan
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSDuration of action of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by optimizing the protein concentration within a specific range (10-50%) rather than using maximum concentrations. This balanced parameter optimization ensures adequate nutrition while maintaining worker bee lifespan, resolving the contradiction between protein quantity and bee longevity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by providing different nutrient concentrations in different portions or forms of the pollen substitute, ensuring that protein is delivered at optimal levels for both growth and longevity. This localized optimization resolves the contradiction between high protein benefits and lifespan preservation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Ease of operation

If floral pollen is added to make pollen substitutes palatable, then bee acceptance improves, but the substitutes still provide inadequate nutrition and require additional floral pollen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebee palatabilityVSAvoidnutrition completeness
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies universality by designing a pollen substitute that simultaneously achieves multiple functions: it is palatable to bees, provides complete nutrition, and does not require additional floral pollen. This multi-functional formulation resolves the contradiction between palatability and nutrition completeness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent merges the functions of palatability enhancement and nutrition provision into a single unified pollen substitute formulation. By combining attractive ingredients with complete nutritional profiles, it eliminates the need for separate floral pollen additions, resolving the contradiction between ease of acceptance and nutrition reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

5Quantity of substance

If bumblebee colonies are fed honeybee-collected pollen, then nutrition can be provided, but bumblebees are exposed to parasites and pathogens

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepollen availability for bumblebeesVSAvoidparasite and pathogen exposure
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies the extraction principle by providing a synthetic pollen substitute that extracts only the beneficial nutritional components while eliminating harmful parasites and pathogens associated with honeybee-collected pollen. This resolves the contradiction between pollen availability and pathogen exposure for bumblebees.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses the pollen substitute as an intermediary that provides nutrition to bumblebees without the harmful contaminants found in honeybee-collected pollen. This intermediary formulation resolves the contradiction between maintaining pollen availability and eliminating parasite and pathogen risks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS20260107958A1Bee nutrition
Publication Date: 2026.04.23 APIX BIOSCIENCES NV
  • US20260107958A1 patent drawing
  • US20260107958A1 patent drawing
  • US20260107958A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention relates to compositions, methods and products for providing nutrition to insects such as bees, e.g., honey bees. Certain embodiments of the present invention also relate to methods of providing nutrition to bees, e.g., colonies of bees together with methods of preparing a composition for providing nutrition to bees.