Shock-Absorbing Bicycle Frame With Stable Seat Support

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing bicycle frames with shock absorbers increase production costs and require complex structures, which are not optimized for efficient shock absorption and rider comfort.

Innovation Solution

A shock-absorbing bicycle frame design with a seat support connected to a front and rear support via an elastic assembly, featuring articulation holes and limiting structures to maintain rider height stability during obstacles, and adjustable elastic assemblies for various road conditions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If shock absorbers are mounted below seats or on front/rear forks, then shock absorption performance is improved, but production costs significantly increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshock absorption performanceVSAvoidproduction cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines the shock absorption function with the existing frame structure by integrating the elastic assembly into the connection between seat support and wheel supports. This merging approach eliminates the need for separate shock absorber components mounted on forks or seat posts, achieving shock absorption while maintaining simple structure and low production cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The frame connection structure serves multiple functions: it provides structural support, enables rotation/movement for shock absorption, and maintains seat position stability. The elastic assembly integrated into this connection performs both structural connection and shock absorption simultaneously, reducing the need for additional specialized components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If elastic assemblies are disposed between front support-rear support and seat support-front support, then shock absorption is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshock absorption performanceVSAvoidframe structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the shock absorption function into the existing frame connection structure. The elastic assembly is integrated into the connection between seat support and wheel supports, combining structural support and shock absorption into a single integrated system rather than adding separate shock absorption mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts the shock absorption function from complex mechanical shock absorber assemblies and implements it through a simplified elastic assembly (spring or rubber element) within the frame connection. This extraction simplifies the overall device complexity while maintaining shock absorption effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Ease of manufacture

If articulation holes are made circular or oblong shape, then ease of manufacture is improved, but shock absorption effectiveness may be reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvearticulation hole fabricationVSAvoidshock absorption effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent specifies circular or oblong shapes for articulation holes, which are standard geometric forms easy to manufacture with conventional machining or forming processes. These parameter specifications balance manufacturing ease with functional requirements, as the hole shape allows sufficient rotation and movement range for the elastic assembly to effectively absorb shocks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enhances shock absorption and rider comfort by maintaining consistent body height over uneven terrain without complex mechanisms, allowing for simple structure adjustments and cost-effective production.

Implementation Method 1

an elastic assembly disposed between the front support and the rear support; where the elastic assembly is rotatably connected to the front support and the rear support

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElastic deformation: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentEP4714812A1Shock-absorbing bicycle frame, and bicycle or electric bicycle
Publication Date: 2026.03.25 ZHANGJIAGANG CHUANJUN VEHICLE IND CO LTD
  • EP4714812A1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP4714812A1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP4714812A1 patent drawingFigure 5

AI summary

A shock-absorbing bicycle frame, comprising: a front support, which is configured to mount a front wheel and a steering assembly; and a rear support, which is configured to mount a rear wheel, wherein the front support is rotatably connected to the rear support, a seat support and an elastic assembly are arranged between the front support and the rear support, the elastic assembly being rotatably connected to the front support and the rear support, the seat support being articulated at one end to the front support or the rear support and at the other end to the rear support or the front support via a limiting structure. The front support, the rear support and the seat support are rotatably connected to each other, and the elastic assembly is mounted between the front support and the rear support, such that by means of the structure, the impact of the ground on a bicycle and a human body is reduced, thereby achieving a shock absorption effect.